Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, pkeys: do not special case protection key 0
To:     Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
References: <20180316214654.895E24EC@viggo.jf.intel.com>
 <20180316214656.0E059008@viggo.jf.intel.com>
 <20180317232425.GH1060@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        tglx@linutronix.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, mingo@kernel.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Message-ID: <f3de330c-e0b4-2210-1a93-f0fb6b5a5b3c@intel.com>
Date:   Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:49:51 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180317232425.GH1060@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 03/17/2018 04:24 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
> So the difference between the two proposals is just the freeing part i.e (b).
> Did I get this right?

Yeah, I think that's the only difference.