Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sun, 18 Mar 2018 11:27:38 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        linux- stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/86] 4.9.88-stable review
Message-ID: <20180318102738.GF32470@kroah.com>
References: <20180316152317.167709497@linuxfoundation.org>
 <CA+G9fYth+j=QNYM-6OBnxncfBruy6W7hXuw-Srt_RMSTqXQ=XQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CA+G9fYth+j=QNYM-6OBnxncfBruy6W7hXuw-Srt_RMSTqXQ=XQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 03:48:24PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On 16 March 2018 at 20:52, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.88 release.
> > There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun Mar 18 15:22:47 UTC 2018.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.88-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
> 
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, qemu_x86_64 and x86_64.
> 
> NOTE:
> CONFIG_LEGACY_VSYSCALL_EMULATE=y is enabled from config as default.
> Enabled vsyscall=native and vsyscall=none from kernel command line for testing
> selftests/x86/test_vsyscall test case on x86_64 and qemu_x86_64.
> 
> test_vdso_64 failed on x86_64 device when vsyscall=none is enabled.
> We will investigate this new test failure.

I think vsyscall=none just went away :)

thanks,

greg k-h