Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Ingenic JZ47xx Timer/Counter Unit drivers
To:     Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc:     James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>,
        Maarten ter Huurne <maarten@treewalker.org>,
        linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
References: <20180110224838.16711-2-paul@crapouillou.net>
 <20180317232901.14129-1-paul@crapouillou.net>
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <aeb57b92-6932-9774-dc50-7563d30846bf@linaro.org>
Date:   Sun, 18 Mar 2018 23:13:13 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180317232901.14129-1-paul@crapouillou.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 18/03/2018 00:28, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is the 4th version of my TCU patchset.
> 
> The major change is a greatly improved documentation, both in-code
> and as separate text files, to describe how the hardware works and
> how the devicetree bindings should be used.
> 
> There are also cosmetic changes in the irqchip driver, and the
> clocksource driver will now use as timers all TCU channels not
> requested by the TCU PWM driver.

Hi Paul,

I don't know why but you series appears in reply to [PATCH v3 2/9]. Not
sure if it is my mailer or how you are sending the patches but if it is
the latter can you in the future, when resending a new version, not use
the in-reply-to option. It will be easier to follow the versions.

Thanks.

 -- Daniel


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog