Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp1304427imn; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 23:46:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELttnLN/VgS6gRBTk9jk+7ooCcX4YHs37TjlB46Hk0OTLZsbkhTAKOMXg0k2XMXqzKKCsoM5 X-Received: by 10.101.99.213 with SMTP id n21mr5329669pgv.202.1521441986778; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 23:46:26 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1521441986; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YvKuvMjW5AptOo24y88P1pAd/xcj6kigiI6ACbCHG/3hiU/cpfKhZf+syOgUsGqv6n NTl3VsTpA5mW0nU791ElHf8bbeA0ntNBB2N9fn/xfrb4cngExSJme3m4WsmZD8XZ7p9e OPtUrohfskgeKPvO7vrKgxUVLDFYLK5ntCtbLmnCheD3EKY28aOjdawIkxMja6kS6yqM acPUUbnic/sOlz/bNapNU7PmKgaYp4Zvo5O5OwNzpKAKbwPTUF0vTYshYqyOCLXk2WIo eOx51u2NbsFZB9o+38cRjCvfcp0KJOrKrZoVQb7+mr/ICNPjr6eBb/Bcyl18CDXxORVq hDDA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=Q9a9NbxsRH3qPZEW2n0mUglF74g97aMj95Zqc5MSpk4=; b=ehGOZf3/ACh0+WRvOXeYInieRZS4xXPqEEHg/Wlf3id0QGMszWzaAqSFRd59bjuPAM ieYWwVYrnGeezHYkhIUkLlzsWmOACO9wigKsziXXt987kAX3r9H+/PFpsjzey4/mM9tU DvFP2IQVF6fKIMHXyfxH2eDOfUYVBkU6aZOzXiRJKBNDJU3dk2LvC8cGo+kLYZxavWbc iJby+zd4g4AsK0LqPnoFgLZ8F9mJL5dCBOUU3Ccb8rw+Ho2XzEpJp+TX6yCcW2F9dsof 1x4K8yq9i0/AHC4QtdsSH22FS2JTqdqQxFd8l/FTSnqV5/aJTB/vwpOPrO8i0txkVDo3 BcUQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f64-v6si11970746plf.624.2018.03.18.23.46.12; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 23:46:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755321AbeCSGi5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 19 Mar 2018 02:38:57 -0400 Received: from la.guarana.org ([173.254.219.205]:52158 "EHLO la.guarana.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755169AbeCSGiz (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2018 02:38:55 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 562 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 02:38:55 EDT Received: by la.guarana.org (Postfix, from userid 1006) id C0C94346001A; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 02:29:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 02:29:29 -0400 From: Kevin Easton To: Dominik Brodowski Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle , James Hogan , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Jiri Slaby , x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] fs: provide a generic compat_sys_truncate64() implementation Message-ID: <20180319062928.GA11309@la.guarana.org> References: <20180318161056.5377-1-linux@dominikbrodowski.net> <20180318161056.5377-3-linux@dominikbrodowski.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180318161056.5377-3-linux@dominikbrodowski.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 05:10:52PM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > The compat_sys_truncate64() implementations in mips, powerpc, s390, sparc > and x86 only differed based on whether the u64 parameter needed padding > and on its endianness. > ... > +#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_SYS_TRUNCATE64 > +#if defined(__ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_SYS_WITH_PADDING) && \ > + defined(__ARCH_WANT_LE_COMPAT_SYS) > +COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE4(truncate64, const char __user *, filename, u32 padding, > + unsigned int, offset_low, unsigned int, offset_high) > +#elif defined(__ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_SYS_WITH_PADDING) && \ > + !defined(__ARCH_WANT_LE_COMPAT_SYS) > +COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE4(truncate64, const char __user *, filename, u32 padding, > + unsigned int, offset_high, unsigned int, offset_low) Notwithstanding the other comments, shouldn't there be a comma between 'u32' and 'padding' in those? - Kevin