Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 201/241] powerpc/modules: Dont try to restore r2 after a sibling call
Date:   Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:07:46 +0100
Message-Id: <20180319180759.506954903@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180319180751.172155436@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20180319180751.172155436@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>


[ Upstream commit b9eab08d012fa093947b230f9a87257c27fb829b ]

When attempting to load a livepatch module, I got the following error:

  module_64: patch_module: Expect noop after relocate, got 3c820000

The error was triggered by the following code in
unregister_netdevice_queue():

  14c:   00 00 00 48     b       14c <unregister_netdevice_queue+0x14c>
                         14c: R_PPC64_REL24      net_set_todo
  150:   00 00 82 3c     addis   r4,r2,0

GCC didn't insert a nop after the branch to net_set_todo() because it's
a sibling call, so it never returns.  The nop isn't needed after the
branch in that case.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h |    1 +
 arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c          |   12 +++++++++++-
 arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c         |    5 +++++
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ int patch_branch(unsigned int *addr, uns
 int patch_instruction(unsigned int *addr, unsigned int instr);
 
 int instr_is_relative_branch(unsigned int instr);
+int instr_is_relative_link_branch(unsigned int instr);
 int instr_is_branch_to_addr(const unsigned int *instr, unsigned long addr);
 unsigned long branch_target(const unsigned int *instr);
 unsigned int translate_branch(const unsigned int *dest,
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
@@ -494,7 +494,17 @@ static bool is_early_mcount_callsite(u32
    restore r2. */
 static int restore_r2(u32 *instruction, struct module *me)
 {
-	if (is_early_mcount_callsite(instruction - 1))
+	u32 *prev_insn = instruction - 1;
+
+	if (is_early_mcount_callsite(prev_insn))
+		return 1;
+
+	/*
+	 * Make sure the branch isn't a sibling call.  Sibling calls aren't
+	 * "link" branches and they don't return, so they don't need the r2
+	 * restore afterwards.
+	 */
+	if (!instr_is_relative_link_branch(*prev_insn))
 		return 1;
 
 	if (*instruction != PPC_INST_NOP) {
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
@@ -95,6 +95,11 @@ int instr_is_relative_branch(unsigned in
 	return instr_is_branch_iform(instr) || instr_is_branch_bform(instr);
 }
 
+int instr_is_relative_link_branch(unsigned int instr)
+{
+	return instr_is_relative_branch(instr) && (instr & BRANCH_SET_LINK);
+}
+
 static unsigned long branch_iform_target(const unsigned int *instr)
 {
 	signed long imm;