Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp1781794imn; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:06:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELtYtWwflvPpee2tOgUgyrnqMbtUCTuGf2/TVty80B2tiat5RP5rH+vQTXG6JKjVYdZH7gDm X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7007:: with SMTP id y7-v6mr13738774plk.275.1521489995496; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:06:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1521489995; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dtP7i19o/4HjeYzV63xNcfEFlbY+2a+NI9JaNbL2HL/s33kCAkNFMJsMb6s9Zit9MJ lcgBxUfg7ovMuP40LplGAQFNDwXgI51FqHGZH0oLdS/cAd6FPDL9xhlCXa/hEFej9QWx ksa9prrBhp+d6rGNBAenknC3ZwXmBrBk0mnarjw7lLBeLGQRjE6BTyd0Y+5aBJ0zpUad Zy/0eqiuto4S/Dcgg+x5z+lAXI30ds3Ffsm13RV7WHlv346W+caOG6ZIuD3XLiSYL/VE La9lXu2nTySlS89heFGesY/cdkA9Q1RnW4V/T72GM1d9WpYnlmkJAyalkDmBzJXOdURx e8jw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=pm8/CRwtRXhOloB0S0gS1DwXwyBDZKOL7UmmqiF8LAo=; b=zEyzJwiWdFLhc2UJ97PbVQNhzya7eA1XWMaCO18YJ5e4bK8DHxGCMr7YznY3ZWSLqW jtbPgc6OSgOWwUDiGGFaFePoGX+0E19C6+CKU99/Ilztxs4QfQZ/AlvE4oOLH2xfaK4+ 20ZPMsitiKIQ3ksDQgfg72/WfcqBAK211BKJHZZNoYrxykos7hvEgkcP1MaU0nsUmSZS atbUxhtrsBLlY3lRZWkFH8jre9DSCWu0NTtV6OBnb87vU/Gn7Og/cpkTa4NxAodxiALU fdKHHfgnhYN+ixqPefoA0jKGhbfDSO2GA2mG+Bz35aazA87NjzrH2wISWigwNQd2ghxk JcMA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 134si447437pgd.709.2018.03.19.13.06.20; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:06:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S969298AbeCSUE3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:04:29 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:45772 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966905AbeCSSRz (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:17:55 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08A57125F; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:17:54 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Bart Oldeman , Andy Lutomirski , Borislav Petkov , Brian Gerst , Denys Vlasenko , "H. Peter Anvin" , Josh Poimboeuf , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , Stas Sergeev , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar Subject: [PATCH 4.4 113/134] selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86: Add test cases for POPF Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:06:36 +0100 Message-Id: <20180319171905.620809760@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.2 In-Reply-To: <20180319171849.024066323@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180319171849.024066323@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Andy Lutomirski commit 78393fdde2a456cafa414b171c90f26a3df98b20 upstream. POPF is currently broken -- add tests to catch the error. This results in: [RUN] POPF with VIP set and IF clear from vm86 mode [INFO] Exited vm86 mode due to STI [FAIL] Incorrect return reason (started at eip = 0xd, ended at eip = 0xf) because POPF currently fails to check IF before reporting a pending interrupt. This patch also makes the FAIL message a bit more informative. Reported-by: Bart Oldeman Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Brian Gerst Cc: Denys Vlasenko Cc: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stas Sergeev Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/a16270b5cfe7832d6d00c479d0f871066cbdb52b.1521003603.git.luto@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c @@ -95,6 +95,10 @@ asm ( "int3\n\t" "vmcode_int80:\n\t" "int $0x80\n\t" + "vmcode_popf_hlt:\n\t" + "push %ax\n\t" + "popf\n\t" + "hlt\n\t" "vmcode_umip:\n\t" /* addressing via displacements */ "smsw (2052)\n\t" @@ -124,8 +128,8 @@ asm ( extern unsigned char vmcode[], end_vmcode[]; extern unsigned char vmcode_bound[], vmcode_sysenter[], vmcode_syscall[], - vmcode_sti[], vmcode_int3[], vmcode_int80[], vmcode_umip[], - vmcode_umip_str[], vmcode_umip_sldt[]; + vmcode_sti[], vmcode_int3[], vmcode_int80[], vmcode_popf_hlt[], + vmcode_umip[], vmcode_umip_str[], vmcode_umip_sldt[]; /* Returns false if the test was skipped. */ static bool do_test(struct vm86plus_struct *v86, unsigned long eip, @@ -175,7 +179,7 @@ static bool do_test(struct vm86plus_stru (VM86_TYPE(ret) == rettype && VM86_ARG(ret) == retarg)) { printf("[OK]\tReturned correctly\n"); } else { - printf("[FAIL]\tIncorrect return reason\n"); + printf("[FAIL]\tIncorrect return reason (started at eip = 0x%lx, ended at eip = 0x%lx)\n", eip, v86->regs.eip); nerrs++; } @@ -264,6 +268,9 @@ int main(void) v86.regs.ds = load_addr / 16; v86.regs.es = load_addr / 16; + /* Use the end of the page as our stack. */ + v86.regs.esp = 4096; + assert((v86.regs.cs & 3) == 0); /* Looks like RPL = 0 */ /* #BR -- should deliver SIG??? */ @@ -295,6 +302,23 @@ int main(void) v86.regs.eflags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_IF; do_test(&v86, vmcode_sti - vmcode, VM86_STI, 0, "STI with VIP set"); + /* POPF with VIP set but IF clear: should not trap */ + v86.regs.eflags = X86_EFLAGS_VIP; + v86.regs.eax = 0; + do_test(&v86, vmcode_popf_hlt - vmcode, VM86_UNKNOWN, 0, "POPF with VIP set and IF clear"); + + /* POPF with VIP set and IF set: should trap */ + v86.regs.eflags = X86_EFLAGS_VIP; + v86.regs.eax = X86_EFLAGS_IF; + do_test(&v86, vmcode_popf_hlt - vmcode, VM86_STI, 0, "POPF with VIP and IF set"); + + /* POPF with VIP clear and IF set: should not trap */ + v86.regs.eflags = 0; + v86.regs.eax = X86_EFLAGS_IF; + do_test(&v86, vmcode_popf_hlt - vmcode, VM86_UNKNOWN, 0, "POPF with VIP clear and IF set"); + + v86.regs.eflags = 0; + /* INT3 -- should cause #BP */ do_test(&v86, vmcode_int3 - vmcode, VM86_TRAP, 3, "INT3");