Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp18035imn; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:04:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELuWHG7TIezVKg8ucv61szAxJN3IPLUSxo0EEIeuh5f/YK0yCgYfRtI7AA2e+Nu8RC7NBaHy X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:227:: with SMTP id 36-v6mr14022864plc.134.1521507843414; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:04:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1521507843; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=o8sl0ffjBrELI5el2v/LbEszf+4i4dS8dU21z8e3cSwD8PDobxWcojD+Z7vjEGeDQ/ /U6yEQeH1cRGPAtt04tEvJ18m1DJ9BQdqEwIGgg9K7iLcSxkgjElKce1yNxhtjozk0rg sIpYS5ndnQFL1OwMmF1Oii64W26lU8iSmZXcI8+Iem9dYqf2dhJVLJEPjFh16EUluKEC s2P8W8YU5HJpnUo/FqHgN26ims9zsyfX6NnOWaFreXW8GfwF9ijLY4cfInGTqhrR6d1q hDxyFWu7RLzKh2Yp+h5kqVdjYt5x3x8PumStridWFtGNEKgZJGiKbqo802uUTv/FKmwj hVWQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=+bP0nq2IT6b6GU/XjLtMEXfcy8Dh7CaTFQhEOwHT+P8=; b=uoEesPoBkNWjZ8H8DlFzHR/6pU0fAheda0Q9p2JwchnLprm9v62t16MqavlACXvGth D/a+XdXXqaqur4BoQbufpaKGQnlCRxTwQIJUrQxd3RUfwtpd5l6XPrJAw6JGlQCl3bFv AE7u29pclKtvd7RYewH04qDN9cIxzOHOdRRddI/fkzy89eF26KO78g1PPfCIxbxMe//J wpLfxf/39s4/BIyiS8n7nEIFKOGjIKuIH1yTmOdTbr/7v4akM7nEvz/DOUYQq8Xtt1kh QC7WvzWOhh6vgeHi3xWceLD/KYtG9grO5EZANvB3ldHkzODeMk72jIwPS0Bnrqgvx4aV 0e8A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n23-v6si440941pll.175.2018.03.19.18.03.49; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:04:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1032205AbeCSSdW (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:33:22 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:54190 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1032180AbeCSSdN (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:33:13 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82D6612B9; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:33:12 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel , Marc Zyngier Subject: [PATCH 4.15 29/52] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Ensure nr_ites >= nr_lpis Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:08:27 +0100 Message-Id: <20180319180736.693337312@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.2 In-Reply-To: <20180319180734.976730813@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180319180734.976730813@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Ard Biesheuvel commit 4f2c7583e33eb08dc09dd2e25574b80175ba7d93 upstream. When struct its_device instances are created, the nr_ites member will be set to a power of 2 that equals or exceeds the requested number of MSIs passed to the msi_prepare() callback. At the same time, the LPI map is allocated to be some multiple of 32 in size, where the allocated size may be less than the requested size depending on whether a contiguous range of sufficient size is available in the global LPI bitmap. This may result in the situation where the nr_ites < nr_lpis, and since nr_ites is what we program into the hardware when we map the device, the additional LPIs will be non-functional. For bog standard hardware, this does not really matter. However, in cases where ITS device IDs are shared between different PCIe devices, we may end up allocating these additional LPIs without taking into account that they don't actually work. So let's make nr_ites at least 32. This ensures that all allocated LPIs are 'live', and that its_alloc_device_irq() will fail when attempts are made to allocate MSIs beyond what was allocated in the first place. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel [maz: updated comment] Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c @@ -1412,7 +1412,7 @@ static struct irq_chip its_irq_chip = { * This gives us (((1UL << id_bits) - 8192) >> 5) possible allocations. */ #define IRQS_PER_CHUNK_SHIFT 5 -#define IRQS_PER_CHUNK (1 << IRQS_PER_CHUNK_SHIFT) +#define IRQS_PER_CHUNK (1UL << IRQS_PER_CHUNK_SHIFT) #define ITS_MAX_LPI_NRBITS 16 /* 64K LPIs */ static unsigned long *lpi_bitmap; @@ -2119,11 +2119,10 @@ static struct its_device *its_create_dev dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL); /* - * At least one bit of EventID is being used, hence a minimum - * of two entries. No, the architecture doesn't let you - * express an ITT with a single entry. + * We allocate at least one chunk worth of LPIs bet device, + * and thus that many ITEs. The device may require less though. */ - nr_ites = max(2UL, roundup_pow_of_two(nvecs)); + nr_ites = max(IRQS_PER_CHUNK, roundup_pow_of_two(nvecs)); sz = nr_ites * its->ite_size; sz = max(sz, ITS_ITT_ALIGN) + ITS_ITT_ALIGN - 1; itt = kzalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL);