Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp39790imn; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:51:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsLOlv+gQ5V3mrMStAoLbzfA61jE5BDtEZtZGhMxzygDJaT/57Nb3KwD7MudjLJq8irL23S X-Received: by 10.99.6.198 with SMTP id 189mr10881529pgg.131.1521510668799; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:51:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1521510668; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OtYXCaIyBcqXAV79qZaWdy3njP38zbFHtEl9UVYb0mZ1ervlzYaSW6o8kIXGHKIweu ZWjapqEkd3OOuriXNVr3CXpPwtVi2D6CXrufZvKpzw6S0WSFgmf08kzkXLAyOpnZQqoD mi+2svOC0hPFxmAzHJevvoCT9JSawsePGlLytqnPWvZYzkzBqO9rHsE6F86xpDlGdFis h2UM4R+Ene1Z80RmxOwhsDsPBjKUBlnNgZwdN4Sb2zmP4HVwgbMhNPn8iEShIvw7bBOZ V5l3bMUgZHAv1VTthxtT6moF4P0OMgHFjAeHgx24RMP4OU7CKAp2FTg6HftCEYeBp/Gg VWWg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=620kqG05OJAaPkSuSGPQw6+4IBMc8RP+0reTpSWcry0=; b=uMxulMj40xVBASSq0rebW25oYHu4JCsXJSFB3vRGd+clfU40dYLTWuOF3UCldhS+5b zVZxN8lDDHkjRGHElgR79cb6Ee4S03oJAlD5HacwlIddDdcxKphYIvF+Wql8jMZ2KgwD tHaui4dzM90d8QWbUMq5QLXSFBQ9CvJ/p16ZkFZ9ztmjP9c1tzVmObhB7FSwxuLBW0AN 1PlMW1B/iq8MoHdRt9wZrP81IP8msAE0P5TrKD1RkE3eEG80e7Ekbh8cZGYFjzid6Yul jY8b/z8Xs0DE5rqXBRbSxgNQHQ0oS1A7sFYkioGk9n/JQB9kDXjSdxy+hGuceaTipzVx mJ6A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z124si395891pgb.677.2018.03.19.18.50.54; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:51:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031609AbeCSUcv (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:32:51 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:42796 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935569AbeCSSMa (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:12:30 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC68111C2; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:12:29 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Kefeng Wang , Masami Hiramatsu , Hanjun Guo , Jiri Olsa , Peter Zijlstra , Wang Nan , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.4 018/134] perf probe: Return errno when not hitting any event Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:05:01 +0100 Message-Id: <20180319171851.774653308@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.2 In-Reply-To: <20180319171849.024066323@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180319171849.024066323@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Kefeng Wang [ Upstream commit 70946723eeb859466f026274b29c6196e39149c4 ] On old perf, when using 'perf probe -d' to delete an inexistent event, it returns errno, eg, -bash-4.3# perf probe -d xxx || echo $? Info: Event "*:xxx" does not exist. Error: Failed to delete events. 255 But now perf_del_probe_events() will always set ret = 0, different from previous del_perf_probe_events(). After this, it returns errno again, eg, -bash-4.3# ./perf probe -d xxx || echo $? "xxx" does not hit any event. Error: Failed to delete events. 254 And it is more appropriate to return -ENOENT instead of -EPERM. Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Hanjun Guo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Wang Nan Fixes: dddc7ee32fa1 ("perf probe: Fix an error when deleting probes successfully") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1489738592-61011-1-git-send-email-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- tools/perf/builtin-probe.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c @@ -405,9 +405,9 @@ static int perf_del_probe_events(struct } if (ret == -ENOENT && ret2 == -ENOENT) - pr_debug("\"%s\" does not hit any event.\n", str); - /* Note that this is silently ignored */ - ret = 0; + pr_warning("\"%s\" does not hit any event.\n", str); + else + ret = 0; error: if (kfd >= 0)