Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S273244AbTHKSCe (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:02:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S273185AbTHKSCU (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:02:20 -0400 Received: from smtp.bitmover.com ([192.132.92.12]:63903 "EHLO smtp.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S273052AbTHKSAW (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:00:22 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:59:41 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Larry McVoy , davej@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle fixes for drm_agpsupport Message-ID: <20030811175941.GB4879@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Jeff Garzik , Larry McVoy , davej@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <20030811164012.GB858@work.bitmover.com> <3F37CB44.5000307@pobox.com> <20030811170425.GA4418@work.bitmover.com> <3F37CF4E.3010605@pobox.com> <20030811172333.GA4879@work.bitmover.com> <3F37D80D.5000703@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F37D80D.5000703@pobox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=0.5, required 7, AWL, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1785 Lines: 48 On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 01:53:17PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Larry McVoy wrote: > are function calls at a 10-nanosecond glance. Also, having two styles > of 'if' formatting in your example just screams "inconsistent" to me :) It is inconsistent, on purpose. It's essentially like perl's return unless pointer; which is a oneliner, almost like an assert(). Maybe this will help: I insist on braces on anything with indentation so that I can scan them more quickly. If I gave you a choice between if (!pointer) { return (whatever); } if (!pointer) return (whatever); which one will you type more often? I actually don't care which you use, I prefer the shorter one because I don't measure my self worth in lines of code generated, I tend to favor lines of code deleted :) But either one is fine, I tend to use the first one if it has been a problem area and I'm likely to come back and shove in some debugging. Before you say "lose the braces" try reading more code and see how much faster it is if all indented stuff has braces. You whiz through it. > Absolutely not. I'm cooler, so my opinion counts more. You are in North Carolina, I'm in San Francisco. No competition, you are sweating like a pig :) > >Same for your eyes when you get to my age. > > I bet when you were in school, you had to chip your homework into slate, > and dinner was brontosaurus-kebob, right? Dinner? You got dinner? Damn, you were spoiled. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/