Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp455755imn; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 07:19:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvMA5B3xTpPn3QsihgIvCM9zbw3WMDunWjaEFUyoe/ZQvhmnTBJ8Mz7eP9Po3rLNteJZj69 X-Received: by 10.101.98.72 with SMTP id q8mr1137920pgv.338.1521555590453; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 07:19:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1521555590; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vm6CmjwY0Zy8HuNrNKjTvIsoYDCMBrNOoCw+fsViHGuhKm2BwbPw6Ez1i95EXnafFh HuuAwp067JusmnmAnk/QA+mpsJDkn79M5YPwb9gvFeCcb+8tkldi1ZC6OBTvIaXz/yY9 IahsQzyrEFkfXObeWwaGKshS9fSH62KSdQBflE4BHgyZK67LAzAPp63KtIL22exzsTqq l/L6qbeKuilrgtqlf75ZMmM2Ua1kdrpvxjBbkymJ6lWRCfzB+11+Svu18tQJNd4GI/2J lW5r6apaTfRC4nc2NtL2QXRNy0UUoDwZ46ZFI2V5ufI7NXujQsEPxGS8c4XeY/aKsrxw Q+Cw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=iDOZMLPhp1Zyf3cK0jNl/H2QX5WQf9N/T/Wj3yK3g0A=; b=IsQe8ToABKHT6Ra2hQJM3TvK1eBGZBflASixhcXmxhPjSs3wRPp0i2IRc1ik7zM10m LcgizjtHSiS1BdMJ/SLvi39kqieEzVX63WGMvtxoi2aFoyoD3CUBB6I2rAA5JsQL5W7K qihOYiUl3AjD0kHk1gYcsjhs1V+R8sqND8qeh37a+NOI23M0rXFqbBGlUci7/tmXi9CW 236yEWZekT5N5n2HI63FHl34VDUMY5WJK6iaRRQR+PBUg70WKOx32jwvWqxWsUoMuNQC rzEdKlM9z/R4POgHIQcDNBDA80TWtXllHXJU+yi5Gb5bekrdFn5PhI9GEPShudx75j5z frQg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t22-v6si1796153plj.233.2018.03.20.07.19.35; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 07:19:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751320AbeCTOSn convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:18:43 -0400 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:44904 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750828AbeCTOSl (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:18:41 -0400 Received: by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id D4D3D208B1; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 15:18:38 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.bootlin.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from localhost (unknown [212.77.163.108]) by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8030E208A6; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 15:18:28 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 15:13:54 +0100 From: Maxime Ripard To: Harald Geyer Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andre Przywara , Icenowy Zheng , info@olimex.com Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 5/5] arm64: allwinner: a64: Add support for TERES-I laptop Message-ID: <20180320141353.zmzq4e5652rsp4ye@flea> References: <20180315162510.11669-1-harald@ccbib.org> <20180315162510.11669-6-harald@ccbib.org> <20180318202251.5gpv6sblfr4edxmj@flea> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180223 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 04:27:36PM +0100, Harald Geyer wrote: > > together with all the patches but the > > PWM (so I had to drop the backlight node as well). > > > > Please coordinate with Andre about who should send the PWM support. > > Seems the patch got broken because only the backlight node but not the > pwm node was removed. Anyway, since Andre has already sent an updated > version of his series, maybe just revert the broken patch, merge his > series and then apply the original teres-i patch again? Unfortunately, there's dependencies on the PWM driver itself, and the maintainer hasn't replied yet. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com