Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: prevent accessing rate_discrete
 uninitialized
To:     Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
References: <20180316114442.9536-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org>
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Organization: ARM
Message-ID: <2f747a8a-3649-b78a-e4f3-4bd8fba66e60@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:36:30 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180316114442.9536-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Anders,

On 16/03/18 11:44, Anders Roxell wrote:
> gcc-5.3 and earlier warns that rate_discrete maybe-uninitialized
>     ../drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c:185:5: warning: 'rate_discrete'
>         may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>       if (rate_discrete)
>          ^
>     ../drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c:128:7: note:
>         'rate_discrete' was declared here
>       bool rate_discrete;
>            ^
> 
Thanks for the fix, applied.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep