Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp649633imn; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 11:46:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELt+yGCDSewM4QcALTe7Sr2jn9dQC5C9R+cINxrKhr4AI8cy5ot1HhbqHM+TDoMG924m9BFt X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7502:: with SMTP id i2-v6mr586848pll.220.1521571566945; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 11:46:06 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1521571566; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XMzK5lUV+QSvoCgPuUWIrSrhL8IAo+ZbrAaoRWV2chvjg6vMoMEFzkbCB9W/fxyR8/ mdeNweH24gGZenzVqMA+9F9ANz2gZy96kyo/IPlUxBlC/ltY9kF9k+g2lhSMqp/DPyp8 nlEQjTZRaySYK3f9hbe2A7OqPGK8C9Utjy6K1YggYbGIzEJILN0AghFlpaS/OSqGcC8x R2UvDU6/R6QUc/CYjdwrumv0Jx0d5vuNw5qGJlh8RKwm0UPdLHJts12YJwyzbV63/F9N YPmxM4lgN9I74srw7od7Axn1V6r7tpG4xdaodl/YAJsb3+5z7KDLOBoAzXfO7jfn2UDS eKFw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:arc-authentication-results; bh=0XQHOqUPoSVN+B1RzmQAXt7l3CYQu1N8c/rvzGCLnIA=; b=FzmllxFELzOYp7jZmzg6mqWgxL39ZDRH5NrPlLVnibv+V8ysCRx7zCiAiSwxO0gnAS Nohp93db1SV+621Ygd+/pFBtWVc8zOCcd5UdTVegkUv4P91djxmFz3NVV8F3dkKHOy7k 0N7do3GGpdywSgdG+xXR772qwHv5cLNz6LHIk1VMEN2//pLHlMna+JgNy3Oe52qj4UAJ icF9rxNutlzoJwYDVi9/Ari6ywzQ4ip+HXh1mkvfxalTnTra8HnRtD6w4J4vqfSD35OX x8iuSnpeQ1bRLEZFvKjZ5vQFDmMafpyhHFQgG0cjVJsYgWMyAeRDPzTeCSIu3QZpDzuT S3Yw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l12-v6si2128069plc.696.2018.03.20.11.45.52; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 11:46:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751600AbeCTSos (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 20 Mar 2018 14:44:48 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:44916 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751269AbeCTSor (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2018 14:44:47 -0400 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABA51AAB; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 18:44:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 12:44:45 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Force asm-goto Message-ID: <20180320124445.3bb1da1c@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20180320155036.GU4043@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20180319154124.337947038@infradead.org> <20180319154717.652679334@infradead.org> <20180320094554.2bc49dea@lwn.net> <20180320155036.GU4043@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:50:36 +0100 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Given that, how about a patch to Documentation/Changes to reflect the new > > reality? It's not in RST yet, so you should be able to go there without > > ill effect :) > > > That thing says: > > GCC > --- > > The gcc version requirements may vary depending on the type of CPU in your > computer. jon > > Which is still entirely accurate. And afaik the 3.2 minimum listed there > still works for !x86. Well, other recent discussions established that nothing earlier than 4.1 has been observed to work anywhere for some time. I guess what we really need is a little table of architecture-specific minimum GCC versions so that our users actually know what's required. I'll see if I can find a moment to pull that together at some point. jon