Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp772016imn; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 15:08:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELuE1hwo7nzYKojXJY+8EnvX3PiPjE2BgiFmZBJabN5v/ij4JkJQbXoMmRppXXG3zwD6nZz9 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7482:: with SMTP id h2-v6mr18410632pll.264.1521583708060; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 15:08:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1521583708; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wG9E6DhfCxw9MAYGl69JHpdYGchWYbmrEWNOs2YEhS+5P98tRWSKtaaBaBj+5jHXaL AwGknBXjDz68/4PUhSlCo+ZfpaYePhi8mrQGjLvnIdmrqDAI31vYB/HN3EuzakzENENl GbtAQvkqwDbPg5RCoek+YgoDYSBMlcwYDQxYQCal1qFO629kUOfp5Aa9k5LN1w0OB8PR CSfSyh6KgovjLWRZ1Tbw7kTDT2be5ClUruhRVfP/vhL0X6hNMB7pSYGA0Q7B13MuAOld QXaKXR07nX815/xmJTd10ietvDQEitkdEhuLCEMMUplxuHQLdZ7a2IpvcwO7LsioFs10 FULg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=qDzBwWyCsPXEatRCp9VZ5MMeR9iI3JjPgI8oDm68D3k=; b=rVWkB8c+V50b6SwutwUqDarfHIWbuUcDzIcj+AnCoUrhLhv/XkK9p7WHN1hwzUQ9BW KN9fZWVQN0GdSKNL2JYnoHr9lrwNPpbhJo2tpCrwMZ8xsv/6GYRz+zjX0eKCrlSfVKuE whEAumDbxAAbbFTQAvDPH/aqTxN/zOT+usUrQT+rALJGkpMiB5XK1RDd60efz/L7uHuC +238lIJ1ytgSD1ujnSkez/SHocdDT03SpXfxNhzjKo/C1N/vmmtkrEwAtvxhvpckmLWF UwC4HwXKs0a9OMbnakdOw1IFBrVUkOVKeLxyMbgTUCfHmGlJ0wnI1/UOSIg2mFvxwbQp q5iw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a71si1659085pfc.178.2018.03.20.15.08.13; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 15:08:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751583AbeCTWHM (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 20 Mar 2018 18:07:12 -0400 Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:38322 "EHLO www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751004AbeCTWHK (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2018 18:07:10 -0400 Received: from [62.202.221.10] (helo=linux.home) by www62.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.85_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eyPPR-0007aW-1q; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 23:07:09 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH] test_bpf: Fix testing with CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y on other arches To: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo , netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yonghong Song , Alexei Starovoitov References: <20180320125851.19650-1-cascardo@canonical.com> From: Daniel Borkmann Message-ID: <46037c83-d612-63f7-00d2-d37a35ca4fe7@iogearbox.net> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 23:07:08 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180320125851.19650-1-cascardo@canonical.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: daniel@iogearbox.net X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.99.3/24404/Tue Mar 20 19:20:33 2018) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/20/2018 01:58 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: > Function bpf_fill_maxinsns11 is designed to not be able to be JITed on > x86_64. So, it fails when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y, and > commit 09584b406742 ("bpf: fix selftests/bpf test_kmod.sh failure when > CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y") makes sure that failure is detected on that > case. > > However, it does not fail on other architectures, which have a different > JIT compiler design. So, test_bpf has started to fail to load on those. > > After this fix, test_bpf loads fine on both x86_64 and ppc64el. > > Fixes: 09584b406742 ("bpf: fix selftests/bpf test_kmod.sh failure when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y") > Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Yep, agree. Applied to bpf tree, thanks Thadeu!