Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp824509imn; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:50:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELuBrXnlzINvVJezyBldC4nnte5HuFamd+gTb8tkHKYSFocsNjj3p0mgNIZ7fXzkO2nC2ab5 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:5501:: with SMTP id f1-v6mr18193149pli.50.1521589834515; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:50:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1521589834; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=P3rOQRFShqZ3RCOEq1ibhPwQQQ7LoGeWSQ01r606WxyOoBcdcqrw8QFivFmJ6H9YRP tm3r7+SsogzKJ4l59VWvNP+ejlMbUJ4Utd7jhbaR+P4CLnw+w/hN+9UV/SST/2Q07OCm 0VkOfcECz5QzJdD+Q+qEn7zmvMZSX/zT46sT/mOmNCgv/aUK7YOPiPzp1Ejcbvz6y8AU xpw0exik25geO6c85oC5o92l5ab48As2qWe/S/ZUaNlvyPQXENglJCVRZ1z+SRMbWcIz Qgy5NB7hcl/aQ9VVUu/S/edPXhX0fr/rluuktSevwXH6IvCTJK2N9YiEmbXEtpwrTCdF MmHw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id:arc-authentication-results; bh=Bu264HVezm3q0Xzx+VciCCWs0vs6cv8eClaxmzyzhpE=; b=PehsASn/hiPl6a4P4MhmQFWA/I95EfYPMgrCSdEdMvuH7xWmcVBE8ugPkNuo+ZUxnn nD7odoytrxpT9mKqgmm0Rrx1puq4XueCWrI5yDU/DO/J5OF0Qpl1jwkaGK4QcikxCosi UGVuJLtGgSaMUwKB21ixgQRafHjL9VstGh4L5JOuFEVFjchYVAexOmGgvEAPJGpULSez 7oOhY1Cse9mdndqSQB43zfix7q3teqaA7Bsehn9M10xV/K7UGS5a+wleihwigENlwsm8 UtlETSWCphgM7zWJ9rPiePONxE6Dy+ODFW2yUX0t+lcJC2m1hFrshWJTZjXbucXqYDcy qbtw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=codethink.co.uk Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 68-v6si2595277pla.343.2018.03.20.16.50.20; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:50:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=codethink.co.uk Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751632AbeCTXt1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 20 Mar 2018 19:49:27 -0400 Received: from imap1.codethink.co.uk ([176.9.8.82]:47199 "EHLO imap1.codethink.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751423AbeCTXtZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2018 19:49:25 -0400 Received: from [167.98.27.229] (helo=xylophone) by imap1.codethink.co.uk with esmtpsa (Exim 4.84_2 #1 (Debian)) id 1eyR0O-0008F5-JR; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 23:49:24 +0000 Message-ID: <1521589759.23626.120.camel@codethink.co.uk> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/86] 4.9.88-stable review From: Ben Hutchings To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Naresh Kamboju Cc: open list , Shuah Khan , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, patches@kernelci.org, linux- stable , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Guenter Roeck Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 23:49:19 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20180318102738.GF32470@kroah.com> References: <20180316152317.167709497@linuxfoundation.org> <20180318102738.GF32470@kroah.com> Organization: Codethink Ltd. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2018-03-18 at 11:27 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 03:48:24PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: [...] > > Results from Linaro’s test farm. > > No regressions on arm64, arm, qemu_x86_64 and x86_64. > > > > NOTE: > > CONFIG_LEGACY_VSYSCALL_EMULATE=y is enabled from config as default. > > Enabled vsyscall=native and vsyscall=none from kernel command line for testing > > selftests/x86/test_vsyscall test case on x86_64 and qemu_x86_64. > > > > test_vdso_64 failed on x86_64 device when vsyscall=none is enabled. > > We will investigate this new test failure. > > I think vsyscall=none just went away :) No, vsyscall=native went away upstream. vsyscall=none should still work everywhere. However, test_vdso_64 isn't able to detect what the current configuration is and it will crash with vsyscall=none (or the equivalent default in kconfig). Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Software Developer, Codethink Ltd.