Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S274971AbTHLCEd (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:04:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S274972AbTHLCEd (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:04:33 -0400 Received: from nessie.weebeastie.net ([61.8.7.205]:12966 "EHLO nessie.weebeastie.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S274971AbTHLCEc (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:04:32 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:02:26 +1000 From: CaT To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: kernel-janitor-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: C99 Initialisers Message-ID: <20030812020226.GA4688@zip.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Organisation: Furball Inc. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 838 Lines: 32 Is there any interest ins omeone 'fixing up' as many structs in the kernel from the form: struct foobar = { cow: moo, cat: meow, } to: struct foobar = { .cow = moo, .cat = neow, } And if so, what form should I feed it back in? Big patches? 1 patch per file? 1 per dir? Main reaosn I'm asking is that it's slowly being done but isn't in the janitor list of things to do yet. If it were I'd just do it. ;) (not on kj-discuss btw so please CC me or lk (or both)) -- "How can I not love the Americans? They helped me with a flat tire the other day," he said. - http://tinyurl.com/h6fo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/