Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp1224918imn; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 05:53:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvoI850jyQYLSVDQ4HqowkUdyBTV0lzG71pxP+1YNnm4eDqHCLX1HnHEXUEQy3M49qi7eTD X-Received: by 10.101.82.139 with SMTP id y11mr14963331pgp.68.1521636798675; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 05:53:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1521636798; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oMZRUX+5yuwywkjK4TSBkDbT9Y3oUAxzeGSKKhFvARjEwXpt3tGWgbFc602JcMNNyh r21M2Zovs+XOo2wDlPJz6CFs0os8oftxfpgNO7a4+J/7TJWDQ+EyAQibmwWPVx+uVshP SIy3OHVLQx4YT8psOFwvwnM51edgOyIV8PMfrMSUKeF63I/gU/fSNIlO2soCP0UvhcZ+ +4dZmETvN34gKWT2bYiY0wo4sBvw84w3H2+tAPdIP6A038+dS31pBVpiq6lwuoyGdB04 3Sa+TaiWG6UqFrU/OIKrR+6+1beh/wlkcd1YOqfOilxHKVBBBDKYnlQgEr3iJ1uhNeYZ xQtg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=kDUHyJ1ptfugnaUUYPOXuqYCp03rm7CbKUy6LFGsmjs=; b=vrCN+x7YB6Z4U5rGdyi0X+u4+YJN7wGzoguTZteWRkUfIZHaQiow5K/dEZ+9B3KM24 wA5LB6gbVjsMDMznNLeXtPBMiBO1TvJqpkTUxS0kItAVPK/eZNcGA8sIzLYW0+Q16s8Z WA/zt0B4Q+IaO5Bp3JOUzY1fUE6uueXHnrpiOH4ZPDtN3fCrDijLF5hSSS3EsFe+F+wp ow9aIU3q2mFqEFDUgYgnAb31cneQ90epXtFvvhJvxoab2Q9ddvjzYkiCxpRvt/MwCyvF FBJQM2/z6SjWYCltrZga6KcQvmxmtAlaVs7kRR8yruojavN2gpK4xjKvkPFaoCZgSjpA xkGw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b1-v6si3721880plm.172.2018.03.21.05.52.31; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 05:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751820AbeCUMuC (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:50:02 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:34374 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751657AbeCUMuA (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:50:00 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w2LCnfl4078086 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:50:00 -0400 Received: from e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.110]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2gumn4ra6a-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA256 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:49:59 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 12:49:58 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.144) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 12:49:55 -0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w2LCnt2K63045830; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 12:49:55 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95944C044; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 12:43:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6454C040; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 12:43:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc3836556865.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.224.160]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 12:43:02 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] vfio: ccw: fix cleanup if cp_prefetch fails To: Dong Jia Shi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: cohuck@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20180321020822.86255-1-bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180321020822.86255-2-bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: Halil Pasic Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 13:49:54 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180321020822.86255-2-bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18032112-0044-0000-0000-0000053E50CE X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18032112-0045-0000-0000-0000287D547B Message-Id: <682d8b1c-5aca-7015-043b-a3f1446bf378@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2018-03-21_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1803210156 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/21/2018 03:08 AM, Dong Jia Shi wrote: > From: Halil Pasic > > If the translation of a channel program fails, we may end up attempting > to clean up (free, unpin) stuff that never got translated (and allocated, > pinned) in the first place. > > By adjusting the lengths of the chains accordingly (so the element that > failed, and all subsequent elements are excluded) cleanup activities > based on false assumptions can be avoided. > > Let's make sure cp_free works properly after cp_prefetch returns with an > error by setting ch_len to 0 for the ccw chains those are not prefetched. This sentence used to be: Let's make sure cp_free works properly after cp_prefetch returns with an error. @Dong Jia I find the 'by setting ch_len to 0 for the ccw chains those are not prefetched' you added for clarification (I guess) somewhat problematic. The chain in which the translation failure occurred + chain->ch_len = idx; is shortened so that only the translated elements (ccws) are going to get cleaned up (on a per element basis) by cp_free. This may or may not be the first ccw. Subsequent chains are shortened to 0 as there no translation took place. So as a result of this change only properly translated ccws are going to get (re)visited by cp_free as only those may have resources bound to them which need to be released. I'm not against improving the commit message. But this ain't an improvement to me. > > Acked-by: Pierre Morel > Reviewed-by: Dong Jia Shi > Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic > Signed-off-by: Dong Jia Shi > --- > drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 9 ++++++++- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c > index d9a2fffd034b..2be114db02f9 100644 > --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c > +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c > @@ -749,11 +749,18 @@ int cp_prefetch(struct channel_program *cp) > for (idx = 0; idx < len; idx++) { > ret = ccwchain_fetch_one(chain, idx, cp); > if (ret) > - return ret; > + goto out_err; > } > } > > return 0; > +out_err: > + /* Only cleanup the chain elements that where actually translated. */ > + chain->ch_len = idx; > + list_for_each_entry_continue(chain, &cp->ccwchain_list, next) { > + chain->ch_len = 0; > + } > + return ret; > } > > /** >