Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/241] 4.9.89-stable review
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com,
        patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
References: <20180319180751.172155436@linuxfoundation.org>
 <ba41bdff-3068-a2e5-717f-715aeab56197@roeck-us.net>
 <20180321132829.GA28002@kroah.com> <20180321133137.GB28002@kroah.com>
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Message-ID: <3315d681-289f-24e9-0618-595b71ec9ff2@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Wed, 21 Mar 2018 06:45:09 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180321133137.GB28002@kroah.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 03/21/2018 06:31 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 02:28:29PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 06:35:01AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On 03/19/2018 11:04 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.89 release.
>>>> There are 241 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>> let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Responses should be made by Wed Mar 21 18:07:03 UTC 2018.
>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>
>>>
>>> For v4.9.88-239-g393003b:
>>>
>>> Build results:
>>> 	total: 145 pass: 143 fail: 2
>>> Failed builds:
>>> 	arm:allmodconfig
>>> 	x86_64:allnoconfig
>>>
>>> arm:
>>>
>>> sound/soc/sh/rcar/cmd.c: In function 'rsnd_cmd_init':
>>> sound/soc/sh/rcar/cmd.c:85:14: warning: array subscript is below array bounds
>>
>> Oops, missed this one for -rc3, let me go dig...
> 
> I don't see anything in this -rc that looks to be causing this.  Has
> this warning been there before, or is it new now?
> 

Probably old. I only mentioned it because you had asked to be informed about warnings.
Does it make sense to bisect ?

Guenter