Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp1396211imn; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 09:39:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELu0HcKpwxQUWeMHf1WePTS8SQ23rNocqcODv/Rl8m0C0cgAwwkWGf4+9a8EQFAXi5X3n0Q4 X-Received: by 10.98.141.205 with SMTP id p74mr8375440pfk.210.1521650349810; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 09:39:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1521650349; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qAZe4abPNroTm4kdd1OvnQsPU3Cg4lzi/0WTEkkJ1arbsPxP+uvX8AlhozMTZUBgbf IeRXtqqv0UftPPUSQgcpkAIrX0P708sCXZIdpaMTkW4ojAq3kmBsTg2spAb8gKOWaoyz df750BqTDGqWfm37FVqp3GEU5PLPcryzOZuH3U5Xz7Hi0dXGkpacikJDqmJ/9DwAIZ8Y Ii/lwmKBXzh/hRyMqrZTCbD78VBM6ZBs5LfuaVW8CAkpPz6LUSum3gmXnXMx73sXGy2o I0fofzS8MWRS89JkDL5oVLI4XnbQCOm5UiK9LNy7hJCvReutVdcAtPOpN1xRUiLsYK6o fIkA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=HfsePvfSCN/Q/VDvm+YGXfownOzMCEhHblcKs4FEudc=; b=iOPRQihctflqNK1sB8JX9ympI2owhau8h1z7RpNoiWkLE5d3Z7c2ZsHzCIaycA5Zoc u5YCLLmwdkf/lg3h6CjX5yS/tmaWy77LQTp6YmEqe5Cq89XMOGe1qr362Nd2+fnzdWCH oWTOpwkPWiSgKm7yx5wr/lnBAo8vOnMts9QwBnSe3+K4+wk8EzzFbXW0W90ib3DGivge EzS7vHowWmX9vjO/3s/XlJh88wkWbx3iJGoKxizglrnakHSjOkU2puexTLJvju0obN5j h/NZ8oLvf8VtgJTmDhKlm+16ZG1RhMBoWD7fp0GOOxQsjBxnfcqkf54Ue7ZdEbTeh1vS MHVA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c63si3292031pfd.51.2018.03.21.09.38.54; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 09:39:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752714AbeCUQhn (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 21 Mar 2018 12:37:43 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:57630 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751714AbeCUQhk (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2018 12:37:40 -0400 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12247-202.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.61.202]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D69951097; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 16:37:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 17:37:38 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Lennart Sorensen Cc: Ben Hutchings , LKML Subject: Re: 4.9.80 compile failure with X86_VSYSCALL_EMULATION=n due to 9a0be5af Message-ID: <20180321163738.GA5269@kroah.com> References: <20180212154325.ge4walt2m6u3ef7g@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <20180321160424.GF18454@kroah.com> <1521649863.23626.130.camel@codethink.co.uk> <20180321163438.7q37vh7pncljib2a@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20180321163438.7q37vh7pncljib2a@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:34:38PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 04:31:03PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 17:04 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 10:43:25AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > > > > Commit 9a0be5af added a reference to vsyscall_pgprot in > > > > arch/x86/mm/kaiser.c but that is undefined if X86_VSYSCALL_EMULATION=n > > > > which on an embedded system where you know how all your software is > > > > compiled is quite likely. > > > > > > > > Of course the condition is always false with that config so the code > > > > will never be run, but the compiler is unhappy. > > > > > > What is the compiler error???I have not had any reports of this with all > > > of the varied builds that we currently run on the stable trees. > > > > You already applied a fix for this ("kaiser: fix compile error without > > vsyscall"). > > Yeah the fix certainly works fine. I was not the only one reporting it. Ah, ok, sorry, was catching up on email... greg k-h