Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp131950imn; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:17:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsgCxDYajFy4sRkJGGUXJ4u5EGjs2Lak9FyXp9/IwA/60YVla+xc4cgeIU0DUYveUQ296ls X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:2983:: with SMTP id h3-v6mr1713178plb.80.1521667041412; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:17:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1521667041; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UyjVsXSmoiMHUaDRMfl+c2CCs1NhpmBSq/zXV+sDckVAvHvEPqZOLT2urf8ckpo97k l8MFl01CVOMy3nx65jIfOIR8vZBRHx/A7bBlfTu/khVQpoiQkHcHZFElE7b1CXVVBwwD yCJcBeyL0LA9KLYhishB6+d5Q7TFS2vcYW3WDupERhXlA8XHXGuEr/Ezs70icyCv5zfq XByQ2PFMCNmcPFzhwWx6SBuO3M+Y/GYRvLFDIEuhiuNXlBz76mUvUbMCkWEOAk2s0G3n m0Gdh5F/G8x2SYvnpAvxxWBjUHQJ94YKo8gOFPN8KLA8E+JdfVdINtD3m+81UJaGNcGK QQgg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=V3V7TfAzVv7H5ZswscExjcQvHvkGiao/WOzCbe6xU2w=; b=YjKNRauCJybJwz8tAbRil9CgKKzT2l5SoVm9iYhZwlBAF8Xhg4e+zENNCU3/9vvnw4 vLnh/G5OQPsXFLeF5EAyjm5dH9PvY/pldISROHu9wkbAbGI7sIW7DuoRlxgMcOR4YLMb R5l06LuqQYlegIouFaW9l4KflkvpAyLfnXOdhY0SNzVbERV8YctjBONPXlBhrHCth6ik l+6yxVho1S8S027EyOSIV7wW2LBtHo1/Q9PnGd8T2PpmtmuRMbCgvRxwyXN7AqfITTEZ 1XoacMpzy1s3KtQJCjnN0RaEU8RS39b8Y4K/HCtsryt135WmAaDoKqP/4u9Fa0sOfI9t TTRw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p6si3345962pgc.456.2018.03.21.14.17.07; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753682AbeCUVPb (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 21 Mar 2018 17:15:31 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:59142 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753364AbeCUVP2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2018 17:15:28 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07521529; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:15:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C949B3F592; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:15:23 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] sched/fair: Introduce an energy estimation helper function To: Quentin Perret , Patrick Bellasi Cc: Juri Lelli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Thara Gopinath , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Morten Rasmussen , Chris Redpath , Valentin Schneider , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Vincent Guittot , Viresh Kumar , Todd Kjos , Joel Fernandes References: <20180320094312.24081-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> <20180320094312.24081-5-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> <20180321090430.GA6913@localhost.localdomain> <20180321122621.GA13951@e110439-lin> <20180321140235.GA2168@queper01-VirtualBox> From: Dietmar Eggemann Message-ID: <832b7772-aa83-5205-874b-06d1fcdc8b86@arm.com> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 22:15:21 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180321140235.GA2168@queper01-VirtualBox> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/21/2018 03:02 PM, Quentin Perret wrote: > On Wednesday 21 Mar 2018 at 12:26:21 (+0000), Patrick Bellasi wrote: >> On 21-Mar 10:04, Juri Lelli wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 20/03/18 09:43, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: >>>> From: Quentin Perret [...] >> Actually I think that this whole function can be written "just" as: >> >> ---8<--- >> unsigned long util = cpu_util_wake(cpu); >> >> if (cpu != dst_cpu) >> return util; >> >> return min(util + task_util(p), capacity_orig_of(cpu)); >> ---8<--- >> > > Yes this should be functionally equivalent. However, with your > suggestion you can potentially remove the task contribution from the > cpu_util in cpu_util_wake() and then add it back right after if > cpu==dst_cpu. This is sub-optimal and that's why I implemented things > slightly differently. But maybe this optimization really is too small to > justify the extra complexity involved ... What about we merge both functions by adding an additional 'int dst_cpu' parameter to cpu_util_wake() (only lightly tested, w/o util_est): --->8--- diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 65a1bead0773..4d4f104d5b3d 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -5860,11 +5860,11 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, } static inline unsigned long task_util(struct task_struct *p); -static unsigned long cpu_util_wake(int cpu, struct task_struct *p); +static unsigned long cpu_util_wake(int cpu, int dst_cpu, struct task_struct *p); static unsigned long capacity_spare_wake(int cpu, struct task_struct *p) { - return max_t(long, capacity_of(cpu) - cpu_util_wake(cpu, p), 0); + return max_t(long, capacity_of(cpu) - cpu_util_wake(cpu, -1, p), 0); } /* @@ -6384,16 +6384,22 @@ static inline unsigned long task_util(struct task_struct *p) * cpu_util_wake: Compute CPU utilization with any contributions from * the waking task p removed. */ -static unsigned long cpu_util_wake(int cpu, struct task_struct *p) +static unsigned long cpu_util_wake(int cpu, int dst_cpu, struct task_struct *p) { unsigned long util, capacity; /* Task has no contribution or is new */ - if (cpu != task_cpu(p) || !p->se.avg.last_update_time) + if ((cpu != task_cpu(p) && cpu != dst_cpu) || + dst_cpu == task_cpu(p) || !p->se.avg.last_update_time) return cpu_util(cpu); capacity = capacity_orig_of(cpu); - util = max_t(long, cpu_rq(cpu)->cfs.avg.util_avg - task_util(p), 0); + util = cpu_rq(cpu)->cfs.avg.util_avg; + + if (likely(dst_cpu != cpu)) + util = max_t(long, util - task_util(p), 0); + else + util += task_util(p); return (util >= capacity) ? capacity : util; } @@ -6409,30 +6415,6 @@ static inline int cpu_overutilized(int cpu) } /* - * Returns the util of "cpu" if "p" wakes up on "dst_cpu". - */ -static unsigned long cpu_util_next(int cpu, struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu) -{ - unsigned long util = cpu_rq(cpu)->cfs.avg.util_avg; - unsigned long capacity = capacity_orig_of(cpu); - - /* - * If p is where it should be, or if it has no impact on cpu, there is - * not much to do. - */ - if ((task_cpu(p) == dst_cpu) || (cpu != task_cpu(p) && cpu != dst_cpu)) - goto clamp_util; - - if (dst_cpu == cpu) - util += task_util(p); - else - util = max_t(long, util - task_util(p), 0); - -clamp_util: - return (util >= capacity) ? capacity : util; -} - -/* * Disable WAKE_AFFINE in the case where task @p doesn't fit in the * capacity of either the waking CPU @cpu or the previous CPU @prev_cpu. * @@ -6488,7 +6470,7 @@ static unsigned long compute_energy(struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu) for_each_freq_domain(fdom) { fdom_max_util = 0; for_each_cpu_and(cpu, &(fdom->span), cpu_online_mask) { - util = cpu_util_next(cpu, p, dst_cpu); + util = cpu_util_wake(cpu, dst_cpu, p); fdom_max_util = max(util, fdom_max_util); } @@ -6506,7 +6488,7 @@ static unsigned long compute_energy(struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu) * busy time. */ for_each_cpu_and(cpu, &(fdom->span), cpu_online_mask) { - util = cpu_util_next(cpu, p, dst_cpu); + util = cpu_util_wake(cpu, dst_cpu, p); energy += cs->power * util / cs->cap; } }