Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp1058192imn; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 14:22:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELuU9jlU9RqTDuWquJzo7+NXykFT2HVrbczCJrwzoIkBeS/Nt690bKAciEFPh3qcbJDfrlnY X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a516:: with SMTP id s22-v6mr26093854plq.191.1521753770036; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 14:22:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1521753769; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=i0cyjShA0nux8IVN9pO8GA8eilyvV75Bg5pPoHw29PcXuAgx3liE2iGlXK0YK4oYUv rzp5qZOS8THR2Tg6wUzDQ1S4Pn9PcelK9lk0Toc+IqEwuWyyF1+nh4zi0YvAP44jdH23 N9TyWEqLwLb5p7zNF1EsQ+w7EYSBlrIVjWqoTvyD152swgG5qOVMkKMc379StMctynfB rGgWQmPFoWXqsYdy3ZIcifLOvBK3mE/N2TYEQEEGpIIfUXjPjlmp40UjhGYzsyR2GGhC IFunxiy9h4Ld5GeMT4PZQDM+K3BqMG5eyFQgCunXngyxxbtNQwBRbabnXBGpnvOe9Imz /KEA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dmarc-filter:arc-authentication-results; bh=XT9TgzqLixAJ4ep4zK6TjghRnx8RwiuX9L+mi3m+4Pg=; b=IDUJyIICwCFQhVk90QdKUp/7sL2O7dGKx4tPXb6xrRJ4PJ8Inaytv4m0UCVaYGtXPb jIvGs4dB+FDLlKzra1bX94+ImFQDtDypQZzcxosI1hFAXCFeLXnqEsyPcOyCvLxJVRgZ T6TLGQs4aoBQTbA5PFbRZYFySr7I8RuhSgzUr5jM1Qxt8osa7FQ+FDu3jfcahO68PhY/ vs4xEe+7P9qpKm2M0Aj6ym0xq6Zscj4C5b5Hs+ifiWncdqtJc9JnC86Rh6M9ofssZ8SX hZpRJHYXnqs0Sm5GWiEa1hrP1ooKBd/1K4Og9YLgAl2XqX6VOL5yWTnFcYUHSIaX0Tux YO2w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m16-v6si7421265pli.415.2018.03.22.14.22.34; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 14:22:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751841AbeCVVVc (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:21:32 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50718 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751617AbeCVVVb (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:21:31 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-172-100-180-131.stny.res.rr.com [172.100.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 145A521770; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 21:21:29 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 145A521770 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=rostedt@goodmis.org Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:21:28 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Andrew Morton Cc: LKML , linux-mm@kvack.org, Michal Hocko , Mel Gorman , Vlastimil Babka , Linus Torvalds , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrey Ryabinin Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, vmscan, tracing: Use pointer to reclaim_stat struct in trace event Message-ID: <20180322172128.41959c1d@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20180322141022.f02476e1f76338ab9cecf62e@linux-foundation.org> References: <20180322121003.4177af15@gandalf.local.home> <20180322141022.f02476e1f76338ab9cecf62e@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 14:10:22 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > Unfortunately this is not a good time. Andrey's "mm/vmscan: replace > mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive with shrink_page_list tracepoint" mucks > with this code quite a lot and that patch's series is undergoing review > at present, with a few issues yet unresolved. > > I'll park your patch for now and if Andrey's series doesn't converge > soon I'll merge this and will ask Andrey to redo things. No problem. I can easily update that patch on top, as it didn't take much effort to write and test it. Just let me know if you do pull in Andrey's work and I need to do the update. Thanks! -- Steve