Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270484AbTHLQFl (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:05:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270486AbTHLQFl (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:05:41 -0400 Received: from fmr01.intel.com ([192.55.52.18]:38324 "EHLO hermes.fm.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270484AbTHLQFZ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:05:25 -0400 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 Subject: RE: [2.6.0-test3] Hyperthreading gone Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:05:05 -0400 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [2.6.0-test3] Hyperthreading gone Thread-Index: AcNgKnoFh1i4frbBQbKaWWQpbf1HjgAv2/JA From: "Brown, Len" To: "Hugh Dickins" , "Grover, Andrew" Cc: "Florian Weimer" , "Marcelo Tosatti" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Aug 2003 16:05:18.0838 (UTC) FILETIME=[869AD160:01C360EB] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2487 Lines: 72 Hugh, My changes go to Marcelo via Andy. This one has been waiting in his staging area while he was out on vacation. Now that he is back -- unless something broke in his tree -- I assume he'll be sending it along to Marcelo shortly. Cheers, -Len Ps. If you'd like to see the code, here it is: Andy's tree: http://linux-acpi.bkbits.net:8080/linux-acpi-2.4 Len's tree: http://linux-acpi.bkbits.net:8080/to-andy-2.4 Pps. Feel free to use my intel e-mail account -- I use my yahoo account mostly to reduce spam so I don't read it every day. > -----Original Message----- > From: Hugh Dickins [mailto:hugh@veritas.com] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:53 PM > To: Len Brown > Cc: Florian Weimer; Grover, Andrew; Marcelo Tosatti; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [2.6.0-test3] Hyperthreading gone > > > Hi Len, > > On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Greg Norris writes: > > > > > Did you select CPU Enumeration Only, or "normal" ACPI? > > > > CPU Enumeration Only. > > > > > If the former, did you specify the "acpismp=force" parameter at > > > bootup? > > > > I didn't. Previous experience (with some 2.5.x versions) indicates > > that Linux does not support full ACPI on this machine. The > > documentation suggests that the command line option enables > full ACPI, > > so I hesitate to do this. > > Florian, at the moment, in 2.4 and in 2.6, you do have to specify the > "acpismp=force" boot parameter to get HT to work with CPU Enumeration > Only: it can't enable full ACPI since you don't have full > ACPI built in, > so no need to hesitate. But of course it's stupid, and the ACPI guys > agree it's wrong and to be fixed. > > Len, what's up with this? I'm not worried about 2.6 right now, but > 4 weeks ago you were about to submit a patch to fix this for 2.4.22, > which is now at 2.4.22-rc2 and still behaving as broken in -pre1. > > Is it time to dig out my own patch and send to Marcelo again? > > Hugh > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/