Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 23 Mar 2018 16:01:26 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Ioana Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@nxp.com>
Cc:     devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] staging: fsl-dpaa2/eth: Move print message
Message-ID: <20180323150126.GA12656@kroah.com>
References: <20180323134413.1532-1-ruxandra.radulescu@nxp.com>
 <20180323134413.1532-3-ruxandra.radulescu@nxp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180323134413.1532-3-ruxandra.radulescu@nxp.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 08:44:06AM -0500, Ioana Radulescu wrote:
> Let the driver remove() function print an informative message
> after it finishes removing the network interface, not at an
> arbitrary point during cleanup.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ioana Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c b/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c
> index beb5959..9fb88f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c
> @@ -2550,7 +2550,6 @@ static int dpaa2_eth_remove(struct fsl_mc_device *ls_dev)
>  	priv = netdev_priv(net_dev);
>  
>  	unregister_netdev(net_dev);
> -	dev_info(net_dev->dev.parent, "Removed interface %s\n", net_dev->name);
>  
>  	if (priv->do_link_poll)
>  		kthread_stop(priv->poll_thread);
> @@ -2571,6 +2570,8 @@ static int dpaa2_eth_remove(struct fsl_mc_device *ls_dev)
>  	dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
>  	free_netdev(net_dev);
>  
> +	dev_info(net_dev->dev.parent, "Removed interface %s\n", net_dev->name);

Why is this even needed?  I'll take it but spamming kernel logs for no
reason is not a good idea :)

thanks,

greg k-h