Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp655060imn; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:39:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvnJlOS9PtdtItxyn1HB5U7mMPV1p07Pv+E45S/4SRNUww0LpCaV4o3n6qmcOOttC+CY2pq X-Received: by 10.98.19.132 with SMTP id 4mr16527012pft.87.1521833972493; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:39:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1521833972; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aTfsuQOCUjIO4RYPui3NWb6MLieEtiuKu+qoQhNXutMjCsV0zFVvF0TEn8NQriVyLp wQu8hX3RCSsm3HmXqLbsVf+nNUBjpzgYEdahJtnO2irbeJZvGNzI/2k9ZfckuNw64jwS 6WtilWMBjwkHOs0xRFtwdVChb2Hw/lJbZTBI7egE8CpHNlC8l0Fc8CfvfK95KbV5+bzP 8LxHn8df5xIszqosJR7KRjcG9OutgqFj0wVOV8haB/Mo9PPdvnxVNMF9JMZl4b8jeJm+ 5QlWvL2sxy1RniMPjIzfwWC0N6iQgYVQ62+62ayb+tTQxuXxBDIXvNZ4HheWB1cbQ4AX QAGQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:cc:references:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=IUOZH+/9SeT6F64hwInNBDX1HlcKZw/ixjODcIFZJZc=; b=D+dAgC1otYua8OXnTeBk+1mun2q4OuP5WyDkGrbnWBd1aatZnC3FBr5kXgSpj9eAwQ 4YvZrEO1GbqzEUQwtU63i9Az1EAKiEZk6zpQqvOCTmM1o07rRp9n+4X5VjCUnskt/XIl 2ajzXq/yVpppWJHkU3Q+yW+Rj//aEEiceViF0oMqC9CpTS/2f6IE5Zb+8T/MNqTX7uO6 SS/kj+ehSk6XDGDURSekg1eF9nPyGNdj/T06mmrZ8NKbm5a4UBomYqzHCLunhcLrWDWe 6aItxpMiIJPYLmkDcvwNEzhtUAhd9eDr3iuqSXXQNoTFXOC/7t7Z+wLt4lZ17gy6/fHD MM8A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z7si6640058pge.522.2018.03.23.12.39.18; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:39:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752523AbeCWTiK (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 23 Mar 2018 15:38:10 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:24046 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752453AbeCWTiJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Mar 2018 15:38:09 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Mar 2018 12:38:09 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,351,1517904000"; d="scan'208";a="185457173" Received: from ray.jf.intel.com (HELO [10.7.201.126]) ([10.7.201.126]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Mar 2018 12:38:08 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] x86/mm: do not auto-massage page protections To: Nadav Amit References: <20180323174447.55F35636@viggo.jf.intel.com> <20180323174454.CD00F614@viggo.jf.intel.com> <224464E0-1D3A-4ED8-88E0-A8E84C4265FC@vmware.com> Cc: LKML , "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" , Andrea Arcangeli , "luto@kernel.org" , "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" , "keescook@google.com" , "hughd@google.com" , "jgross@suse.com" , "x86@kernel.org" From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:38:07 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/23/2018 12:34 PM, Nadav Amit wrote: >>>> + /* mmdebug.h can not be included here because of dependencies */ >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM >>>> + WARN_ONCE(pgprot_val(pgprot) != massaged_val, >>>> + "attempted to set unsupported pgprot: %016lx " >>>> + "bits: %016lx supported: %016lx\n", >>>> + pgprot_val(pgprot), >>>> + pgprot_val(pgprot) ^ massaged_val, >>>> + __supported_pte_mask); >>>> +#endif >>> Why not to use VM_WARN_ON_ONCE() and avoid the ifdef? >> I wanted a message. VM_WARN_ON_ONCE() doesn't let you give a message. > Right (my bad). But VM_WARN_ONCE() lets you. I put a comment in up there about this ^^. #including mmdebug.h caused dependency problems, so I basically just reimplemented it using WARN_ONCE() and an #ifdef.