Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp1171275imn; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 05:26:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELs+iFx8HQBzo68E+JBanRGUQBDlg+QM82FD6T7GQRhVF0G84sI/PPCiRuOBDkQ3BeOPln+i X-Received: by 10.101.97.165 with SMTP id i5mr1722306pgv.449.1521894414219; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 05:26:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1521894414; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Lv9/CEFo5lvY+jJTD0xc2PrvB9NguwGfAJzs+eQxWdf78bRXXKBbW8duqyDBZUbd1c Q27nZ7C3aIRV1tWsFZ1vq2r65UsOpG5xXdZpT1kQpiqdq41eEXqq3O5ktuzmqqLtwXfx WPcKaWk5liKrRzxp6klDOgAQQBLTVa2IEH3h4Pd505psg02mlHAM9CAiW8z6zFSiJZ9H +eEWThVTpK5fkisP0AOuSV58eYoiZqdwvjHCw0zJBVY8sDEIYDkBw7Ew8yOB65gYRBA4 WX4oJD3WmfUOc87kjOTGkV12QhweO7QwHiPaJlxSYc+v7JIMbE3BbH89Pee01PDZ8KBN jgrQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=WHFmlfNAE9U76an5wu3zBer5Fq9IRnmvrxVUl0/2ymQ=; b=TQyEinotpuL1atZdcSgxD8+tBWHeWBIzbKPRP7s7LaVn+YnxlPFZNgyrZ2jH929SoB kzJ7oUkTf2nD7/WSYuJCLPR8ybO81ClDSW5zGo7taqjdeVyYB1mHuzpwHbqRhAxGna92 RAEsz0AtBo/xWXCLgTRYgdj3kI7CkRyQXZT1WUDKLmEbRBWqewDcP1XB+I7xPMFdxtvZ vwvJI5YsHMXyQGYrgspQ8iWFi56sNjz99oozj1hX5r9JbQ+Kd49CS6WnN14eYINnAf/m 387Nn1YDOlqY3d6V/tzO5tyDxI2qCcXJKswITOtTAJesEDwHoAP6bNfoVRIBXlyxWF4Y nClw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=klXQgHgv; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o1-v6si10778584pld.255.2018.03.24.05.26.39; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 05:26:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=klXQgHgv; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752109AbeCXMZd (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 24 Mar 2018 08:25:33 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f195.google.com ([209.85.192.195]:34939 "EHLO mail-pf0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751879AbeCXMZb (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Mar 2018 08:25:31 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f195.google.com with SMTP id y186so5759184pfb.2 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 05:25:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=WHFmlfNAE9U76an5wu3zBer5Fq9IRnmvrxVUl0/2ymQ=; b=klXQgHgvOS7d+p6/4zp7JWGtGlEabkxZ0PCGUwUj/FTbPXzP5xbK5VjNfDf5uz163K MjfeHwkdMHDU5rT797Nq4FFizpeGpbcHrVCDGyf26KRPskz4vcW8BfW+T5awAwDbgsuP j2DrVD0bkTkS4YsIIPigrwxbvgfiBi5Cb68Du9tcu/dv2+JlsjJy5YFtQ04ZKQCjfAXC 6fsxTC1630InUaUY12Ivy2Q9DrNPBUaQhnucAUUr/fdZN+P4FjJRAp7OyJOCEoKx+JVh 0O9LxkYSWT64Mq+SHeC++SMQr746kGS3ARtDJHVe3E8jUEPVQzeQptLhzoI2C1qlaQvf XQxg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=WHFmlfNAE9U76an5wu3zBer5Fq9IRnmvrxVUl0/2ymQ=; b=GybaemfWZ/btVU9ZUjqevJRaQmTa4283K8yEM5uxaO6pt13iu3g2TRZBbuxT/PrvR2 o2hnZPOAgoR42n47xeDIu/s1thIInboEm5yIcYUQ26b4C5YHXgfveHXb11CrA745Pgkp 5lh3Z4AgalF5Zqp7H2Rm3+LP0OCgQpHBWO3nvqvuWQqCzZobmJwhuuuanHQomtubpGf1 q2EMmH5IXUC4hfDRU0pKo7L+88LCj5ZFHViTmK2c1WXL7C95NkUAptk1G9IfqhuDhu/s KDDC8x+omICbUgzN61ZoCOzeWQuIxSBN1cPsuaVJbm2bOR8STylPiyYYQMCr1ET8iWwe 3HtA== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7EVfYEHNm6q5RTQciqBOEfwOa3lWQOjq4kawd/mV69ayxIUXorh 3NtdL6dqZIsiCxttx0aO0vI= X-Received: by 10.99.160.67 with SMTP id u3mr23107365pgn.389.1521894331295; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 05:25:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([38.106.11.25]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b6sm23152371pfm.160.2018.03.24.05.25.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 24 Mar 2018 05:25:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Jia He To: Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , Catalin Marinas , Mel Gorman , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Pavel Tatashin , Daniel Jordan , AKASHI Takahiro , Gioh Kim , Steven Sistare , Daniel Vacek , Eugeniu Rosca , Vlastimil Babka , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, James Morse , Ard Biesheuvel , Steve Capper , x86@kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kate Stewart , Philippe Ombredanne , Johannes Weiner , Kemi Wang , Petr Tesarik , YASUAKI ISHIMATSU , Andrey Ryabinin , Nikolay Borisov , Jia He , Jia He Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] mm: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in memblock_next_valid_pfn() Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 05:24:39 -0700 Message-Id: <1521894282-6454-3-git-send-email-hejianet@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1521894282-6454-1-git-send-email-hejianet@gmail.com> References: <1521894282-6454-1-git-send-email-hejianet@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns where possible") optimized the loop in memmap_init_zone(). But there is still some room for improvement. E.g. if pfn and pfn+1 are in the same memblock region, we can simply pfn++ instead of doing the binary search in memblock_next_valid_pfn. Signed-off-by: Jia He --- include/linux/memblock.h | 2 +- mm/memblock.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- mm/page_alloc.c | 3 +- 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h index efbbe4b..a8fb2ab 100644 --- a/include/linux/memblock.h +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ void __next_mem_pfn_range(int *idx, int nid, unsigned long *out_start_pfn, #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP */ #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID -unsigned long memblock_next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn); +unsigned long memblock_next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn, int *idx); #endif /** diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c index bea5a9c..06c1a08 100644 --- a/mm/memblock.c +++ b/mm/memblock.c @@ -1102,35 +1102,6 @@ void __init_memblock __next_mem_pfn_range(int *idx, int nid, *out_nid = r->nid; } -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID -unsigned long __init_memblock memblock_next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn) -{ - struct memblock_type *type = &memblock.memory; - unsigned int right = type->cnt; - unsigned int mid, left = 0; - phys_addr_t addr = PFN_PHYS(++pfn); - - do { - mid = (right + left) / 2; - - if (addr < type->regions[mid].base) - right = mid; - else if (addr >= (type->regions[mid].base + - type->regions[mid].size)) - left = mid + 1; - else { - /* addr is within the region, so pfn is valid */ - return pfn; - } - } while (left < right); - - if (right == type->cnt) - return -1UL; - else - return PHYS_PFN(type->regions[right].base); -} -#endif /*CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID*/ - /** * memblock_set_node - set node ID on memblock regions * @base: base of area to set node ID for @@ -1162,6 +1133,50 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_set_node(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size, } #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP */ +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID +unsigned long __init_memblock memblock_next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn, + int *last_idx) +{ + struct memblock_type *type = &memblock.memory; + unsigned int right = type->cnt; + unsigned int mid, left = 0; + unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn; + phys_addr_t addr = PFN_PHYS(++pfn); + + /* fast path, return pfh+1 if next pfn is in the same region */ + if (*last_idx != -1) { + start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(type->regions[*last_idx].base); + end_pfn = PFN_DOWN(type->regions[*last_idx].base + + type->regions[*last_idx].size); + + if (pfn < end_pfn && pfn > start_pfn) + return pfn; + } + + /* slow path, do the binary searching */ + do { + mid = (right + left) / 2; + + if (addr < type->regions[mid].base) + right = mid; + else if (addr >= (type->regions[mid].base + + type->regions[mid].size)) + left = mid + 1; + else { + *last_idx = mid; + return pfn; + } + } while (left < right); + + if (right == type->cnt) + return -1UL; + + *last_idx = right; + + return PHYS_PFN(type->regions[*last_idx].base); +} +#endif /*CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID*/ + static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_range_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end, int nid, ulong flags) diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 2a967f7..0bb0274 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -5459,6 +5459,7 @@ void __meminit memmap_init_zone(unsigned long size, int nid, unsigned long zone, unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn + size; pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid); unsigned long pfn; + int idx = -1; unsigned long nr_initialised = 0; struct page *page; #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP @@ -5490,7 +5491,7 @@ void __meminit memmap_init_zone(unsigned long size, int nid, unsigned long zone, * end_pfn), such that we hit a valid pfn (or end_pfn) * on our next iteration of the loop. */ - pfn = memblock_next_valid_pfn(pfn) - 1; + pfn = memblock_next_valid_pfn(pfn, &idx) - 1; #endif continue; } -- 2.7.4