Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp714624imn; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 11:13:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48v6gNiVAt/usmHv8N57cgCpkVfSwRnlWa0/T7ZWKJkXPB4y8nSmSJdyxbUmzpCH42yOXgr X-Received: by 10.101.80.133 with SMTP id r5mr1036580pgp.100.1522001592472; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 11:13:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1522001592; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lH2kd6IVGoKtPQhTmYcMGzYBePD4MUrOIxCQRJFlWHXFLxwDAiM+kaX0eYPMlWhlKr QeYPlY1UsouJpbNuhrwnO5AQiVuCNvNIy1Qdr9Kjk9C2HplfxEGIaMbAcAQL3i+xmVuC lmGc603isV1aJQxjswSIV+lAaZ4uvxNRvUifnupag1dtQTyhuUwfRx2F7waKllbx5jHy sg0VKaf1XY04f8FHCoqEjgSXNuPO0Nn+3XZ0MH1pm8LBWtAvw04ybNdDUQTzFI6EakwE fGLetsoYuyTRSogpFZOBFJ61U9Dyv6/4qZfYFDoS4K5RIDnYkmDLiSBR0lx0BTQbVg6n 4LEg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:dkim-signature:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=dypalZVp2/wP/mSB41f4bi7GqZwUVkj0LbP0nihfGaE=; b=JqfnfXz89dIFin7OtsSQssA4Iz+7ul9ArhpgSEQoZg4M/uEGIDiO73WTRPDqOfwmXm 0kLJ/Z/9+O2TAShyIJf7agBfLApqLMD8D3l9xU/54ll1gAKbC9jIryt2J9iEqjXplFCy W5x+oeqHZBwl79DgVALV4uquJf+E39rnTs89kRHsxSWqqWNlKriyU3xil5MsYSqgJw37 dPbZli6A4DWl1hawWadf2oL3rhRBcwn5t53jLTed7Kk871Fxr5fp1CqmeFCmrmJuMCr1 lrP0N3fguqFUd0Fr/tEX57X533hYMzIUpJf1j4CYyFTh37BAHkDNCHmKCPIpA8Y0+/Ea U28Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@agner.ch header.s=dkim header.b=xW0bE5Q6; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y30-v6si12851956plh.441.2018.03.25.11.12.58; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 11:13:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@agner.ch header.s=dkim header.b=xW0bE5Q6; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753984AbeCYSKp (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 25 Mar 2018 14:10:45 -0400 Received: from mail.kmu-office.ch ([178.209.48.109]:54219 "EHLO mail.kmu-office.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753868AbeCYSKF (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Mar 2018 14:10:05 -0400 Received: from trochilidae.lan (unknown [IPv6:2001:1620:c6e:0:814c:3584:bd88:6cb6]) by mail.kmu-office.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53D465C1FB7; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 20:09:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Stefan Agner To: linux@armlinux.org.uk, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, arnd@arndb.de Cc: robin.murphy@arm.com, nicolas.pitre@linaro.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, behanw@converseincode.com, keescook@chromium.org, Bernhard.Rosenkranzer@linaro.org, mka@chromium.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Agner , Dmitry Osipenko , Stephen Warren , Thierry Reding Subject: [PATCH v2 3/6] ARM: trusted_foundations: do not use naked function Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 20:09:56 +0200 Message-Id: <20180325180959.28008-4-stefan@agner.ch> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.2 In-Reply-To: <20180325180959.28008-1-stefan@agner.ch> References: <20180325180959.28008-1-stefan@agner.ch> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=agner.ch; s=dkim; t=1522001376; bh=dypalZVp2/wP/mSB41f4bi7GqZwUVkj0LbP0nihfGaE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References; b=xW0bE5Q6C5L3ZEjaj8u6It0mzAZr8ZKTqrk3M6AZIOa5OjFgiTEam6TD+enZO4LzxHubCq1wyNJVarGfyxUQr6se8y75U5NNJusUm2OZBVNxJjLpHvawDg8E2exLrQSPP2q3epG/0MxucVxgX2ExlKwEYocRA79E8L7lNjX3N2g= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org As documented in GCC naked functions should only use Basic asm syntax. The Extended asm or mixture of Basic asm and "C" code is not guaranteed. Currently this works because it was hard coded to follow and check GCC behavior for arguments and register placement. Furthermore with clang using parameters in Extended asm in a naked function is not supported: arch/arm/firmware/trusted_foundations.c:47:10: error: parameter references not allowed in naked functions : "r" (type), "r" (arg1), "r" (arg2) ^ Use a regular function to be more portable. This aligns also with the other smc call implementations e.g. in qcom_scm-32.c and bcm_kona_smc.c. Cc: Dmitry Osipenko Cc: Stephen Warren Cc: Thierry Reding Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner --- Changes in v2: - Keep stmfd/ldmfd to avoid potential ABI issues arch/arm/firmware/trusted_foundations.c | 14 +++++++++----- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/firmware/trusted_foundations.c b/arch/arm/firmware/trusted_foundations.c index 3fb1b5a1dce9..689e6565abfc 100644 --- a/arch/arm/firmware/trusted_foundations.c +++ b/arch/arm/firmware/trusted_foundations.c @@ -31,21 +31,25 @@ static unsigned long cpu_boot_addr; -static void __naked tf_generic_smc(u32 type, u32 arg1, u32 arg2) +static void tf_generic_smc(u32 type, u32 arg1, u32 arg2) { + register u32 r0 asm("r0") = type; + register u32 r1 asm("r1") = arg1; + register u32 r2 asm("r2") = arg2; + asm volatile( ".arch_extension sec\n\t" - "stmfd sp!, {r4 - r11, lr}\n\t" + "stmfd sp!, {r4 - r11}\n\t" __asmeq("%0", "r0") __asmeq("%1", "r1") __asmeq("%2", "r2") "mov r3, #0\n\t" "mov r4, #0\n\t" "smc #0\n\t" - "ldmfd sp!, {r4 - r11, pc}" + "ldmfd sp!, {r4 - r11}\n\t" : - : "r" (type), "r" (arg1), "r" (arg2) - : "memory"); + : "r" (r0), "r" (r1), "r" (r2) + : "memory", "r3", "r12", "lr"); } static int tf_set_cpu_boot_addr(int cpu, unsigned long boot_addr) -- 2.16.2