Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp974530imn; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 20:04:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/V7A4Cn0/pwBzRbMk5P0YB5ADM6inbOqiAe94uwzJ90simqxzrS7Wjj3IvzMfYMHtoVSEX X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7502:: with SMTP id i2-v6mr6528616pll.220.1522033480551; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 20:04:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1522033480; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Q1D+hHc7xdmQ33B9SIzLEMnEG2l8oMojNERAAdhLOQ2APC42+ytX0T8KY87kz6qY1B O7OQIV++1YAdZLrLDhe9mhyM8WSCXiJ5UxfKikAlWCmXNaoNslEr/oLpx4sRGqBFI3Dr 5JkquMmMekp4TVWB4tQTODA/UXz0UO5VT6kl4ZmAiwlYH0jiGakwHEXqKh3MCEef//XI eBzi/Zadjxi8x9i7KC0/PutD9FIy7zRs7poBzxotMDgKmqcPNGi1hGCLkxlPakywTUz2 5fXtbQ1Y/iMdESvS4vESkUIi4IewOVgEnMwUXTUWxGbUAeC/9LcQYoOXRHIq9qMdhnKe 2N3Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=55ieW/LTZYeMDJL1hR8ylXiv01MjBZdLkYda+qYTSmA=; b=TMZBRAQhuvlHYYNck8DlQJvEgM0sHKlo/rUBUaFp89TA9OO3FwpyIE3Ji77YbwOe2d h+23UOEbm+hJ4djHNrUEw5/bumZXLvfkcGVKa+a/0PSTKMKuAg/rsKW0BajzBgO+lBAx w47Rritfoj1euriFuBy2Ge+AoelOhYBr0O4SaLh80nrvh+CCUNUOzyuA+V7hTn0xfd1g MJnSk2ltUW5pS7GL6k7887T37xwzVNuGIGl3c+uQIu+L+snDtgkAPy/VLVMf+Sbxp2hV tHn6ZLmLmicNpcPqaRaicEas7TPZ8Q1HY4TxNyQFVD4PkQA4LrgllBq8Xaybc2lAvwnH 1eqg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=VpHAEf7U; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i63si9575040pge.289.2018.03.25.20.04.26; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 20:04:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=VpHAEf7U; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752113AbeCZDDP (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 25 Mar 2018 23:03:15 -0400 Received: from mail-pl0-f66.google.com ([209.85.160.66]:43272 "EHLO mail-pl0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750981AbeCZDDN (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Mar 2018 23:03:13 -0400 Received: by mail-pl0-f66.google.com with SMTP id f23-v6so11098427plr.10 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 20:03:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=55ieW/LTZYeMDJL1hR8ylXiv01MjBZdLkYda+qYTSmA=; b=VpHAEf7UHUyDYFkPQJw1lxGsRaxmx0DevsyxVXe3pInnoN+kZr9pw3+Ud+rSKaK0t3 eBqigsgA8BuOWLYvKPw4dg7cx1LlTi/31FOk6gJRp7ADHEcGYkCKhxoVHR5Ikkspq9kv LTQ2KF2pTD1lnKwuM8hD9RZGYxxI4cp0qPz+/bhvuTyal5f5WBr/e4KFtioOKiRYpV78 mSWuJoR6xtIcMN5NSvYCcn1oKQhSlbpD2HteXnabE/QIDOUMZBh/2+Q2SioaF7dRLmn7 HgaS6ncFh0YnUon+2mO92ztSZ68bCmcFhUrDfhCzQ1I3/Ax//DVrGDhcpNzy5KUWuQco FjHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=55ieW/LTZYeMDJL1hR8ylXiv01MjBZdLkYda+qYTSmA=; b=eKVpscqgZ020m+p3Nilc9E4RLZfB9PpFxfAL5CjqinrPkUh4xrgFxKl+bCM0+/1mJU PBeZH61SDyLD7wCuy05o9rJmsA1r1gvqO52CJfqp01Lr2fmNiVp/JLfI0fufCeuXknfW dwZskbJG5/mmq9PGSjqqMPgH5RwInztkgw/RKnuduG29cnAu3ThIVMiNmpr3LASqjTzk RipPHqkn/TcO0nfEOAECA0KGBDVTq+MInlT8Q8on8BHSC1fUI665EEGa5lKyETYYUkY+ pyydl4QXVUTmO7ZpYnKSJoMYsOqGFBJ9M5abGbpNtTSTIqwgmbpoxktWMUlHH5jzyl8A uT/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7ETy4rqgTQeX86SKuF/e5viRlc9SHGHt2q4XAPGtOwkDhKU7+kB V/dMpnih18RgllLyTJKbSqQ= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b485:: with SMTP id y5-v6mr8100471plr.91.1522033392534; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 20:03:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([38.106.11.25]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f19sm1634989pgv.39.2018.03.25.20.03.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 25 Mar 2018 20:03:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Jia He To: Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , Catalin Marinas , Mel Gorman , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Ard Biesheuvel , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Pavel Tatashin , Daniel Jordan , AKASHI Takahiro , Gioh Kim , Steven Sistare , Daniel Vacek , Eugeniu Rosca , Vlastimil Babka , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, James Morse , Steve Capper , x86@kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kate Stewart , Philippe Ombredanne , Johannes Weiner , Kemi Wang , Petr Tesarik , YASUAKI ISHIMATSU , Andrey Ryabinin , Nikolay Borisov , Jia He , Jia He Subject: [PATCH v3 2/5] mm: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in memblock_next_valid_pfn() Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 20:02:16 -0700 Message-Id: <1522033340-6575-3-git-send-email-hejianet@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1522033340-6575-1-git-send-email-hejianet@gmail.com> References: <1522033340-6575-1-git-send-email-hejianet@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns where possible") optimized the loop in memmap_init_zone(). But there is still some room for improvement. E.g. if pfn and pfn+1 are in the same memblock region, we can simply pfn++ instead of doing the binary search in memblock_next_valid_pfn. This patch only works when CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID is enable. Signed-off-by: Jia He --- include/linux/memblock.h | 2 +- mm/memblock.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- mm/page_alloc.c | 3 +- 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h index efbbe4b..a8fb2ab 100644 --- a/include/linux/memblock.h +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ void __next_mem_pfn_range(int *idx, int nid, unsigned long *out_start_pfn, #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP */ #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID -unsigned long memblock_next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn); +unsigned long memblock_next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn, int *idx); #endif /** diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c index bea5a9c..06c1a08 100644 --- a/mm/memblock.c +++ b/mm/memblock.c @@ -1102,35 +1102,6 @@ void __init_memblock __next_mem_pfn_range(int *idx, int nid, *out_nid = r->nid; } -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID -unsigned long __init_memblock memblock_next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn) -{ - struct memblock_type *type = &memblock.memory; - unsigned int right = type->cnt; - unsigned int mid, left = 0; - phys_addr_t addr = PFN_PHYS(++pfn); - - do { - mid = (right + left) / 2; - - if (addr < type->regions[mid].base) - right = mid; - else if (addr >= (type->regions[mid].base + - type->regions[mid].size)) - left = mid + 1; - else { - /* addr is within the region, so pfn is valid */ - return pfn; - } - } while (left < right); - - if (right == type->cnt) - return -1UL; - else - return PHYS_PFN(type->regions[right].base); -} -#endif /*CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID*/ - /** * memblock_set_node - set node ID on memblock regions * @base: base of area to set node ID for @@ -1162,6 +1133,50 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_set_node(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size, } #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP */ +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID +unsigned long __init_memblock memblock_next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn, + int *last_idx) +{ + struct memblock_type *type = &memblock.memory; + unsigned int right = type->cnt; + unsigned int mid, left = 0; + unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn; + phys_addr_t addr = PFN_PHYS(++pfn); + + /* fast path, return pfh+1 if next pfn is in the same region */ + if (*last_idx != -1) { + start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(type->regions[*last_idx].base); + end_pfn = PFN_DOWN(type->regions[*last_idx].base + + type->regions[*last_idx].size); + + if (pfn < end_pfn && pfn > start_pfn) + return pfn; + } + + /* slow path, do the binary searching */ + do { + mid = (right + left) / 2; + + if (addr < type->regions[mid].base) + right = mid; + else if (addr >= (type->regions[mid].base + + type->regions[mid].size)) + left = mid + 1; + else { + *last_idx = mid; + return pfn; + } + } while (left < right); + + if (right == type->cnt) + return -1UL; + + *last_idx = right; + + return PHYS_PFN(type->regions[*last_idx].base); +} +#endif /*CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID*/ + static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_range_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end, int nid, ulong flags) diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 2a967f7..0bb0274 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -5459,6 +5459,7 @@ void __meminit memmap_init_zone(unsigned long size, int nid, unsigned long zone, unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn + size; pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid); unsigned long pfn; + int idx = -1; unsigned long nr_initialised = 0; struct page *page; #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP @@ -5490,7 +5491,7 @@ void __meminit memmap_init_zone(unsigned long size, int nid, unsigned long zone, * end_pfn), such that we hit a valid pfn (or end_pfn) * on our next iteration of the loop. */ - pfn = memblock_next_valid_pfn(pfn) - 1; + pfn = memblock_next_valid_pfn(pfn, &idx) - 1; #endif continue; } -- 2.7.4