Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp1155159imn; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 01:41:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx499X5a60Ul8QJqDzCqTVMqRH3TSG1tOox77v/KZp0fcbG4rN7dTW8BMH/24h4xIZgvkswu7 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6590:: with SMTP id c16-v6mr3467145plk.109.1522053690397; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 01:41:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1522053690; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Kgo+utXU0/iCmNrT6Gdxw5R1Jcua5IshavTYzYKqq/fiTGXUFJoDOCv1ZL7g4Ekq98 ERnYgw50UT3YlwxhgLxnOWe6hFkjyZ+yfOegGDaJuUo/pE4kFNH4IDmodpwXjyf/b2mF DWe9IzjSLgZSYMxWuO0ohwj1lQy+2Spq/E8LIzW804B9ZizMuBaF5OJfRupjTCiOT9p1 RFjAGp/GTvmEHUhKxw64x+UKG7B6CTnTH6Mu5GQSIvOU1Vwj4fgxbHT7uniTcoDJRVBm T4LCc8g6CwrKmapw8bP8AAqIXuuOT5poXtYCD+ewcURuCPDdp7/Bf65EX2aZXimzibJP SO9g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=l0BhNphpTdCt2nOJMQ4oUzTGKcauxoQRi8G4tDyiIso=; b=NKURJoYE+H4EIdNspkPXbZkx/FItHykKQYMHDWKp3KNTYECv/N3SBgso8mY8V5qHYK bu5BWV+Uyr89dgauevnB5Jh3U31eD06IUfUWgC03qGh1bCBF8HQYfPgz3E0id6Lx6gWX k3gg7K8s6ENIk5O4uWXpbfmxRg0mKSQ8BZgpRhekH0am1DklKcrayu3PHCeDL3Np7SZw xXfHGd/mTXASB1sjIuVBVxZ4t3FXZYv28Vkszk3Ge+QnxzP0W+lb45ZHvuSUsp6d54tc U3/pvWsO5QJmAdIs/t/kMxHsEg4m37J+7MqaMMx722kY1YMwHv6u/hp+G/GYn+C8JOed +ymA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b11-v6si15812110plk.688.2018.03.26.01.41.16; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 01:41:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751374AbeCZIjb (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 04:39:31 -0400 Received: from wp227.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.234]:53794 "EHLO wp227.webpack.hosteurope.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750783AbeCZIja (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 04:39:30 -0400 Received: from ip4d15e3ad.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([77.21.227.173] helo=[192.168.66.118]); authenticated by wp227.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1f0Nf4-0002NU-4Z; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 10:39:26 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] genirq/affinity: irq vector spread among online CPUs as far as possible To: dedekind1@gmail.com, Ming Lei , Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Laurence Oberman References: <20180308105358.1506-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <1520515113.20980.31.camel@gmail.com> From: Thorsten Leemhuis Message-ID: Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 10:39:25 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1520515113.20980.31.camel@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-MW Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;regressions@leemhuis.info;1522053570;393b4f2c; X-HE-SMSGID: 1f0Nf4-0002NU-4Z Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Lo! Your friendly Linux regression tracker here ;-) On 08.03.2018 14:18, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 18:53 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: >> This patchset tries to spread among online CPUs as far as possible, so >> that we can avoid to allocate too less irq vectors with online CPUs >> mapped. > […] > Tested-by: Artem Bityutskiy > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519311270.2535.53.camel@intel.com > > this patchset fixes the v4.16-rcX regression that I reported few weeks > ago. I applied it and verified that Dell R640 server that I mentioned > in the bug report boots up and the disk works. Artem (or anyone else), what's the status here? I have this on my list of regressions, but it looks like there wasn't any progress in the past week. Or was it discussed somewhere else or even fixed in the meantime and I missed it? Ciao, Thorsten