Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp1269458imn; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 04:27:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+43Fdv2VJ6WFZQllFcpA6XuIHTNuQIF4PcJE8PdKRQ1KO6p1/fDRjwBKg0hg/1NhffqVsr X-Received: by 10.98.157.157 with SMTP id a29mr5842317pfk.39.1522063637755; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 04:27:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1522063637; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=R2IOaB3lutV/fHEe+fN5jNGVvTPc5pgFZTsOPIaPH0xGTm9UHgP4xB9rRGzFfJ4jXA yAV9HQMoN6sY2B7nvs6zcjAz6wLlNTp8NJuJCknVpVMzj1OCBq6gsI1kvLNVLv1mn2/z AiR/OGFDxRf49xiqcn6G8Lx6ZyDCyXEQm5GQ0UiFeWEGeCQ/olls9RLvTwPlIAQBtu0y k3eHs6gJjg0EKSE79ApLNTNZm3yUweTLK4EDYm/AfZpOqettN3FCdpZ8/GhzMl1gbhD5 tdGNAKGERtQj4Wi4cdZ7mlEiJe8c2WkV0mQR0Aq0yIwOf0Dy1omJ4HI9SBu/5eUgaLO4 Lqzw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=QjhYAOKViFO2A8kaHrG6OnO7iAJI3VWICEgcOKUVcCw=; b=mNWRCBZYNNXnBZqibUi5OqjjQvTRNRKm2bRm29ychYBH0dy5saMnxp/3pwthBHkX32 HmZaa9CfIExCMf7tBUVqWzX50t/7g9m9fDIjEs0xcDS2ElpEhjDkgAgonEFSBwU1LebN 1gsn0mkSGWhP8KC4bFmudN9tYzOjtuAGASYaZYX16ZVvvrBOJDQ9vddAMVwHBJVqGyhN 8y6wOWbwwgNT0vyM0Os15ZNrnK+KE9KChYc1oRq3ZgmY9R8PNHSZSt+T+V8ZcXdFYz5H YgIGvywJJFXBMPgvAcnpvF3WNCLPIWD1YDBiJOdrpOV6wUqcUyPAT5w339ajAOnwZK8l DH4w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 142si9386097pfy.7.2018.03.26.04.27.02; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 04:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751692AbeCZLZm (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:25:42 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:44818 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751107AbeCZLZj (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:25:39 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w2QBOTMf146368 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:25:39 -0400 Received: from e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.110]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2gxy5n2980-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA256 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:25:39 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:25:37 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.144) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:25:35 +0100 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w2QBPZ6056623268; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:25:35 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D4311C050; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:18:00 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B4411C052; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:18:00 +0100 (BST) Received: from oc3836556865.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.224.160]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:18:00 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] vfio: ccw: error handling fixes and improvements To: Cornelia Huck , Dong Jia Shi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20180321020822.86255-1-bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180326110224.1af0ad13.cohuck@redhat.com> From: Halil Pasic Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 13:25:34 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180326110224.1af0ad13.cohuck@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18032611-0044-0000-0000-0000053FE458 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18032611-0045-0000-0000-0000287EFAC5 Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2018-03-26_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1803260125 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/26/2018 11:02 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 03:08:18 +0100 > Dong Jia Shi wrote: > >> Hi Conny, >> >> Halil reported a host crash when using vfio-ccw. The root cause of the problem >> is that vfio_pin_pages fails with EINVAL for reasons unknown. He has >> experienced such failures after online-ing a dasd in the guest (the dasd has 3 >> partitions, hat may or may not have any significance). The problem isn't >> experienced on every attempt to online the dasd, and breaking at css_do_ssch >> seems to make things work. >> >> One thing is sure: the host kernel should not crash under the described >> circumstances. >> >> To fix the problem, the first patch of this series fixes the cleanup when >> cp_prefetch fails in the higher level. The 2nd and the 3rd patches provide >> correctness and denfensive actions for the interfaces in the lower level. > > So, is the first patch stable material? I think it should be. > >> >> The 4th patch is trying to add tracepoints for vfio-ccw, so that we can debug >> such issue easier in future. > > Tracepoints are nice :) > >> >> For details see the commit message portions of the inividual patches. > > Still digging through the post-vacation mail pile, will do more looking > later. > > >> Thanks. >> >> Dong Jia Shi (2): >> vfio: ccw: refactor and improve pfn_array_alloc_pin() >> vfio: ccw: set ccw->cda to NULL defensively >> >> Halil Pasic (2): >> vfio: ccw: fix cleanup if cp_prefetch fails >> vfio: ccw: add traceponits for interesting error paths >> >> drivers/s390/cio/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------ >> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c | 13 ++++ >> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_trace.h | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 4 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_trace.h >> >