Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp1614355imn; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 10:55:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsjdCQkX7OL7VmN/iv+WCjgjnKzKecLRzoqVfQke4w9qSgIgI6WCYwnfJ99lBDB+8E13gO3 X-Received: by 10.99.100.197 with SMTP id y188mr28665999pgb.277.1522086933025; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 10:55:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1522086932; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rhzZR4GNO+gsXZPcKo0Dj2pRIwBzRuFPlEceDPtVW0bPbjUcm2ZvclVQeFkxrMi/kw iTK4KdBvSa+tkGzPpBuBeSZDkSXcMnZh486NkKUD7JmcG96vDhr23gl60Bhd2kgnNpq8 JhnyCg+ty9svovA9iGbb94DXDbxiyxCfxBWUNRtXAQgciyWTolkobIyXUJp1eEbZ5KgU yyIt25uRXrhdwkNPxOYFDx7n8fMwLbuQujYrQ0LfQegFZTCY+0ON2vkshr1eejSaAm/O eLlmSoQqCUHVIZ+vJeDmU63IS8MQ85ZLbujWMWGesOmkLYOItWUDfjQKFS57qWABkyda +EDA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:cc:references:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=wmGxe3bPPL/qS5w6LKHPkYaHy9LWHaAi6yhuKnKTbiY=; b=CvtiDgDe5uke8QduVrVzDSWEKJTnQ4q2LmKGRlzvpH3MUP8xZclpVBnP2hZII7S19E VIj4PkJwYcbLQCKv9I1Zfk4jL6UMijlTb1HEIQJvAotkomFxGtqlw8JfAE1JTVz8OSUE sQEZ8I3yWRJ+AgyTjsGhz+GYQ1KawRoREADMC1fAxKRWqw1+YjX3hu/S8V5IvDUU4xbj 2aXHZNJUhihOx2mgYl42l8XFq8s14RJK3hV/62gDg/VgiVBiX3YeOH4co0pIbNnqJqhB 7N/akYZpNO8WIlWgd2ugkCWtAcgVFyiSgikEMdiDTtjBo4FrjI0XkNAVXeQevu6pKQXU mpHw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l28si1329793pfk.38.2018.03.26.10.55.16; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 10:55:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752787AbeCZRxj (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 13:53:39 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:10398 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752622AbeCZRxi (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 13:53:38 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Mar 2018 10:53:38 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,365,1517904000"; d="scan'208";a="38268001" Received: from ray.jf.intel.com (HELO [10.7.201.16]) ([10.7.201.16]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Mar 2018 10:53:37 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] x86, pkeys: do not special case protection key 0 To: Shuah Khan , Dave Hansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20180326172721.D5B2CBB4@viggo.jf.intel.com> <20180326172722.8CC08307@viggo.jf.intel.com> <9c2de5f6-d9e2-3647-7aa8-86102e9fa6c3@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, stable@kernel.org, linuxram@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, mingo@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Shuah Khan From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 10:53:35 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9c2de5f6-d9e2-3647-7aa8-86102e9fa6c3@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/26/2018 10:47 AM, Shuah Khan wrote: > > Also what happens "pkey_free() pkey-0" - can you elaborate more on that > "silliness consequences" It's just what happens if you free any other pkey that is in use: it might get reallocated later. The most likely scenario is that you will get pkey-0 back from pkey_alloc(), you will set an access-disable or write-disable bit in PKRU for it, and your next stack access will SIGSEGV.