Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 0/8] Packed ring for vhost
To:     Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc:     mst@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <1522035533-11786-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
 <20180326190130.GE6928@char.us.oracle.com>
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1e5ad820-f11a-8208-d4c0-5d871adddb9e@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Mar 2018 11:33:38 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180326190130.GE6928@char.us.oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 2018年03月27日 03:01, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:38:45AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> Hi all:
>>
>> This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with pmd
>> implement by Jens at
>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html. Minor change
>> was needed for pmd codes to kick virtqueue since it assumes a busy
>> polling backend.
>>
>> Test were done between localhost and guest. Testpmd (rxonly) in guest
>> reports 2.4Mpps. Testpmd (txonly) repots about 2.1Mpps.
> And how does it compare to older ring layout?
>

No obvious difference.

Vhost itself becomes a bottleneck. I plan to do more aggressive batching 
like dpdk on top.

Thanks