Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S275268AbTHMP5f (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2003 11:57:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S275269AbTHMP5f (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2003 11:57:35 -0400 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.133]:63903 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S275268AbTHMP5b (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2003 11:57:31 -0400 Subject: Ltp regression test results for 2.6.0-test3, bk1, mm1, mm2 From: Paul Larson To: lkml , ltp-results , linstab@osdl.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5 Date: 13 Aug 2003 10:57:14 -0500 Message-Id: <1060790234.27851.2883.camel@plars> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3236 Lines: 57 Here are the results of some automated nightly regression tests I've been running with LTP. This is similar to what Mark Peloquin has been releasing here, but with a focus on LTP functional/regression testing rather than performance. For right now, this just includes the runalltests.sh script, but may be expanded to include other LTP (and possibly non-ltp) tests in the future. These tests are all done on a 4-way PIII 700, 4GB, debian unstable, with frequent updates and refreshes of the LTP cvs tree. There are also detailed results and system info you can browse to from the links listed below. Please let me know if this is useful and how it can be made more useful. Thanks, Paul Larson 2.6.0-test3 vs 2.6.0-test3-bk1 http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk1/ Test Name 2.6.0-test3 2.6.0-test3-bk1 Regression Improvement ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N setegid01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N 2.6.0-test3 vs 2.6.0-test3-mm1 http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-vs-2.6.0-test3-mm1/ Test Name 2.6.0-test3 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Regression Improvement ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N setegid01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N 2.6.0-test3-mm1 vs 2.6.0-test3-mm2 http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-mm1-vs-2.6.0-test3-mm2/ Test Name 2.6.0-test3-mm1 2.6.0-test3-mm2 Regression Improvement ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N setegid01 FAIL PASS [1] N Y swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N [1] setegid started passing here because I ran an apt-get dist-upgrade and got an updated (fixed) version of glibc between these two test runs. So it should be passing from now on. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/