Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp691069imn; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:04:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsdOiKRkyJXJllCKLSWQt7o7Bzy/er7VRvx4NI5F4Tl9XwEzWppAos7Yc0NBjDuzBTXuJ0D X-Received: by 10.98.133.139 with SMTP id m11mr21026337pfk.49.1522159491419; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:04:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1522159491; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ta0uQo3uQ82nzrkzu1f/FxTqyc4T17kWwtDbsFpEEbWJQ2gk8fUluiftqlZrmjH9Xu cBKF6dLFI36laTYtHGKJblQoNxDIGRttDUcGrBQgSIhSoZGdKp7J+mQp3PYEHttHp6Qb XzFiSG4C4STXcBkrXID3wyReIvMOLBr+9rp6ypycjQnRe/S5tFYUta9DyLVAZGHgUmWF NZcSdXXYr0YMo6mhe6qfZpdrBMYy6cCvam7+5Rp3GA8wRA/cn5ST9uZIfS8UfrTwv0/w pd4WVS5xw0ortEhx/WaHsNIjxwxwSa4KgELFmu8jpus514stoVazbQFu+udbqK5qzcH/ HVqQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=LoImbNKiNvMX/UN0PBtmPTAnSd8DyuSa24dB/Srss8c=; b=dF343iG+eey3zhz61iSAn0hRE/kNQaMTRC8RrF4Hqh8AlA+h8fVCDlrSXRLcPh0XRk zash0iXiINef5VtrPMfqUayEQWNSuaRZhP6y6XQX4F6vg3qSln9mpygVc57HeIWXaQcG EeETJGfaCadtQm4PhGNyGwgSWsq5hClZka7fiVPwvQBn70muYRi4lh5eLf+mkWqlq48Y VVPoVeh6N2BUC07w2lKLPjDXceRCCLi8cW+EYSKOWtfVDbDiZqIaJ3GrqkAqo3pPb3qG /1K9MpscHPVCnkJZiWqFSevPsQFJNiefUlUmw6O0/4I97I5h9I76zv8J0kj1AhVUD6Sf i/cQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g1-v6si1388974plp.327.2018.03.27.07.04.34; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:04:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752866AbeC0OBd (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 27 Mar 2018 10:01:33 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:41412 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752665AbeC0OBc (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2018 10:01:32 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w2RE1PY2047175 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 10:01:31 -0400 Received: from e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.109]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2gyn2fqkrq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA256 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 10:01:30 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 15:01:24 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.143) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 15:01:22 +0100 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w2RE1LS28192256; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 14:01:21 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4738CAE055; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 14:51:35 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB01AE04D; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 14:51:34 +0100 (BST) Received: from [9.152.212.49] (unknown [9.152.212.49]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 14:51:34 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: 4.16-RC7 WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 0 at block/blk-mq.c:1400 __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue To: Ming Lei Cc: Jens Axboe , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , Christoph Hellwig , Christian Borntraeger , Heiko Carstens , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Martin Schwidefsky References: <96392d4b-f890-7b34-8f1e-8d51855327cc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180327120143.GA20265@ming.t460p> From: Stefan Haberland Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:01:21 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180327120143.GA20265@ming.t460p> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-GB X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18032714-0012-0000-0000-000005C3D0DD X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18032714-0013-0000-0000-000019400BE7 Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2018-03-27_06:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1803270142 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > This warning is harmless, please try the following patch: > > -- > From 7b2b5139bfef80f44d1b1424e09ab35b715fbfdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ming Lei > Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 19:54:23 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] blk-mq: only run mapped hw queues in blk_mq_run_hw_queues() > > From commit 20e4d813931961fe ("blk-mq: simplify queue mapping & schedule > with each possisble CPU") on, it should be easier to see unmapped hctx > in some CPU topo, such as, hctx may not be mapped to any CPU. > > This patch avoids the warning in __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() by > checking if the hctx is mapped in blk_mq_run_hw_queues(). > > Reported-by: Stefan Haberland > Cc: Christoph Hellwig > Fixes: 20e4d813931961fe ("blk-mq: simplify queue mapping & schedule with each possisble CPU") > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei > --- Hi Ming, thanks a lot for the patch. I tried it on top of our 4.16-rc7 branch and it works well. I ran a small regression test set against it and I did not notice any warnings or other obvious impacts. Regards, Stefan