Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S275338AbTHMSIb (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2003 14:08:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S275339AbTHMSIa (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2003 14:08:30 -0400 Received: from 153.Red-213-4-13.pooles.rima-tde.net ([213.4.13.153]:23300 "EHLO small.felipe-alfaro.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S275338AbTHMSIY (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2003 14:08:24 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test3-mm1 interactivity scheduling mistakes (smp) From: Felipe Alfaro Solana To: Helge Hafting Cc: LKML In-Reply-To: <20030813180020.GA1339@hh.idb.hist.no> References: <20030813180020.GA1339@hh.idb.hist.no> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1060798101.603.47.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 20:08:21 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1632 Lines: 39 On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 20:00, Helge Hafting wrote: > I ran a "nice make -j3 bzImage" on 2.6.9-test3-mm1 in order > to compile 2.6.0-test3-mm2 on my dual celeron. > > While waiting I played cuyo, a lightweight game similiar to tetris. > > This mostly behaved as expected, with a responsive game. > But mozilla (on some other virtual desktop) occationally > refreshed its page, causing several seconds with jerky response > in the game. > > This is wrong for two reasons: > 1. There should be enough cpu with two processors, > one running the game and another the heavy mozilla stuff. > The make was niced after all. No guessing, I told it explicitly. > > 2. The game has very interactive behaviour, it uses 4-10% cpu > and cause X to use about 20%. Mozilla may have been idle for a > while, getting "interactive". But it shouldn't remain > interactive for so long, it sat at 100% till it went > idle again. > > X runs with elevated priority, (std. debian testing setup) > but that shouldn't matter - X only used 20% and that was > for the game and two xterms. Mozilla wasn't visible > at all. I can't tell you why, but for me, X behaves horribly if it's not reniced exactly at +0. In the past, I reniced X at -20, but Con told me that with O??int patches, X must/should work with no nicing at all. Could you please try again with X not reniced? Thanks! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/