Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp900426imn; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 10:50:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+3UC5TfF9A1/xinSH6zOLaPmxxUStdF0ndeU5k0dEE8p5EWHoM9eSd0raoizyQYoz4aSdJ X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:20e6:: with SMTP id v35-v6mr285439plg.226.1522173038462; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 10:50:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1522173038; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zM4AAHI6vOrPxbKGM9rAN+CFxUk/h++3LhyzvzAOI2d7VXRJ9qBMQ4DmQkXzfAgFDl I7Y6HytWMfTMetb/AFNe4F/hShlBkgN5uS0vbrLmztlDx+s8yHhvk7rJc9aZlRhx8Msx 4GHrtEwToPM8n3R2Xo3/cCckbiyaemn22/NWIySYKTOtlPfk0qBy3vIy0Q0gW5ejq7pG r4LiBcbcokRzHixy637lOSAB3bVFYCMJblDojZIWceodr/O3uOkHPt1VLTOlSczFAoY6 y+0iNUvUccUQVFgvP3cv4TV07MbwwEZetz4otkLuDOgw3JSdkbB9qQ+86Qp31TJjVssd V7qw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:cc:references:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=R4PBSH/LSPgU73TwwbRQj/zuAh63o6qraskbalIA+/E=; b=lfPUylUvlaReNE6oSPmemBC//uOUKxU/q8fDbyZwjS+h5fOr3Hd4rRl3grzv6yGYgO PSRX65O8pgydPl0s6n+nr3qRgQZB7Jxjadbv4eb60kUdkE6LoIzZ4NiUdt4ewOGDzupJ E6+9Y7OMMig2xjEc3OG1ZBBCMoOk+yjQvkVjFSfw9WKkKmcdnZgSpEikGxDu/rZeKyy9 qiTbBdrvbp+PeUzh7IdAwgDEUr3SrKC1pEHTu1fwntyJvVdUF/rprOSgoe9/fiE32LfG UEJW9tov2c1T7Mz7WWi55EpaiQ/8qyqG3nZoR8egeo7QbvxZ2odv+M/a0EPjQuKH7fca BMcQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f5-v6si1492877plr.243.2018.03.27.10.50.23; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 10:50:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753693AbeC0Qce (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 27 Mar 2018 12:32:34 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:62350 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753639AbeC0Qc3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2018 12:32:29 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Mar 2018 09:32:28 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,367,1517904000"; d="scan'208";a="45736048" Received: from ray.jf.intel.com (HELO [10.7.201.16]) ([10.7.201.16]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Mar 2018 09:32:28 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Use global pages with PTI To: Thomas Gleixner References: <20180323174447.55F35636@viggo.jf.intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mm , Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Lutomirski , Kees Cook , Hugh Dickins , =?UTF-8?B?SsO8cmdlbiBHcm/Dnw==?= , the arch/x86 maintainers , namit@vmware.com From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:32:27 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/27/2018 06:36 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> User Time Kernel Time Clock Elapsed >> Baseline ( 0 GLB PTEs) 803.79 67.77 237.30 >> w/series (28 GLB PTEs) 807.70 (+0.7%) 68.07 (+0.7%) 238.07 (+0.3%) >> >> Without PCIDs, it behaves the way I would expect. > What's the performance benefit on !PCID systems? And I mean systems which > actually do not have PCID, not a PCID system with 'nopcid' on the command > line. Do you have something in mind for this? Basically *all* of the servers that I have access to have PCID because they are newer than ~7 years old. That leaves *some* Ivybridge and earlier desktops, Atoms and AMD systems. Atoms are going to be the easiest thing to get my hands on, but I tend to shy away from them for performance work.