Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180327193323.Horde.S-Hqc40p7JjEsZPPEa3YNg1@messagerie.si.c-s.fr>
References: <20180322202007.23088-1-malat@debian.org> <20180322202007.23088-15-malat@debian.org>
 <97df68d1-d4fe-bf8e-7852-9b418eec042f@c-s.fr> <CA+7wUsxVW1a2yvyhYv=YFNV1VEQCcro5JDN1RewghVaHDq5znw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180324211020.Horde.kEO4b3mHPV88FKM0OiRT0Q1@messagerie.si.c-s.fr>
 <CA+7wUszsJUJJeb+xhzjGr8YxDt-BYruBwda7Dq-nFfyt0sU0ew@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180327175806.Horde.f26UMak3wqEtNtiMmJy51w2@messagerie.si.c-s.fr> <20180327193323.Horde.S-Hqc40p7JjEsZPPEa3YNg1@messagerie.si.c-s.fr>
From:   Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Date:   Wed, 28 Mar 2018 09:26:56 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+7wUsz-ihu7aoE4UfVhojDjH0pcR8QbVGLCzMyA3RocLJz5-A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/19] powerpc/altivec: Add missing prototypes for altivec
To:     LEROY Christophe <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc:     kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 7:33 PM, LEROY Christophe
<christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> wrote:
> LEROY Christophe <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> a =C3=A9crit :
>
>
>> Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> a =C3=A9crit :
>>
>>> Christophe,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 9:10 PM, LEROY Christophe
>>> <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> a =C3=A9crit :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 1:19 PM, christophe leroy
>>>>> <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 22/03/2018 =C3=A0 21:20, Mathieu Malaterre a =C3=A9crit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some functions prototypes were missing for the non-altivec code. Ad=
d
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> missing prototypes directly in xor_vmx, fix warnings treated as
>>>>>>> errors
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> W=3D1:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx_glue.c:18:6: error: no previous prototyp=
e
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> =E2=80=98xor_altivec_2=E2=80=99 [-Werror=3Dmissing-prototypes]
>>>>>>>   arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx_glue.c:29:6: error: no previous prototyp=
e
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> =E2=80=98xor_altivec_3=E2=80=99 [-Werror=3Dmissing-prototypes]
>>>>>>>   arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx_glue.c:40:6: error: no previous prototyp=
e
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> =E2=80=98xor_altivec_4=E2=80=99 [-Werror=3Dmissing-prototypes]
>>>>>>>   arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx_glue.c:52:6: error: no previous prototyp=
e
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> =E2=80=98xor_altivec_5=E2=80=99 [-Werror=3Dmissing-prototypes]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>  arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx.h b/arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx.=
h
>>>>>>> index 5c2b0839b179..2173e3c84151 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx.h
>>>>>>> @@ -19,3 +19,17 @@ void __xor_altivec_4(unsigned long bytes, unsign=
ed
>>>>>>> long
>>>>>>> *v1_in,
>>>>>>>  void __xor_altivec_5(unsigned long bytes, unsigned long *v1_in,
>>>>>>>                             unsigned long *v2_in, unsigned long
>>>>>>> *v3_in,
>>>>>>>                             unsigned long *v4_in, unsigned long
>>>>>>> *v5_in);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +void xor_altivec_2(unsigned long bytes, unsigned long *v1_in,
>>>>>>> +                            unsigned long *v2_in);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only used in one place, should be static instead of adding it in a .=
h
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Same for the other ones.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> $ git grep xor_altivec_2
>>>>> [...]
>>>>> arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx_glue.c:EXPORT_SYMBOL(xor_altivec_2);
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you sure I can change this function to static ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes you are right.  But in fact those fonctions are already defined in
>>>> asm/xor. h
>>>> So you just need to add the missing #include
>>>
>>>
>>> I originally tried it, but this leads to:
>>>
>>>  CC      arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx_glue.o
>>> In file included from arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx_glue.c:16:0:
>>> ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/xor.h:39:15: error: variable
>>> =E2=80=98xor_block_altivec=E2=80=99 has initializer but incomplete type
>>> static struct xor_block_template xor_block_altivec =3D {
>>>               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/xor.h:40:2: error: unknown field =E2=80=98na=
me=E2=80=99
>>> specified in initializer
>>>  .name =3D "altivec",
>>>  ^
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> The file <asm/xor.h> (powerpc) is pretty much expected to be included
>>> after <include/linux/raid/xor.h>.
>>>
>>> I did not want to tweak <asm/xor.h> to test for #ifdef _XOR_H just befo=
re
>>>
>>> #ifdef _XOR_H
>>> static struct xor_block_template xor_block_altivec =3D {
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> since this seems like a hack to me.
>>>
>>> Is this ok to test for #ifdef _XOR_H in <arch/powerpc/include/asm/xor.h=
>
>>> ?
>>
>>
>> What about including linux/raid/xor.h in asm/xor.h ?

This leads to:

  CALL    ../arch/powerpc/kernel/systbl_chk.sh
In file included from ../arch/powerpc/include/asm/xor.h:57:0,
                 from ../arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx_glue.c:17:
../include/asm-generic/xor.h:688:34: error: =E2=80=98xor_block_32regs=E2=80=
=99 defined
but not used [-Werror=3Dunused-variable]
 static struct xor_block_template xor_block_32regs =3D {
                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../include/asm-generic/xor.h:680:34: error: =E2=80=98xor_block_8regs=E2=80=
=99 defined
but not used [-Werror=3Dunused-variable]
 static struct xor_block_template xor_block_8regs =3D {
                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../arch/powerpc/lib/xor_vmx_glue.c:17:0:
../arch/powerpc/include/asm/xor.h:39:34: error: =E2=80=98xor_block_altivec=
=E2=80=99
defined but not used [-Werror=3Dunused-variable]
 static struct xor_block_template xor_block_altivec =3D {
                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  CALL    ../arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init_check.sh


>
> Or better: including linux/raid/xor.h then asm/xor.h in xor_vmx_glue.c ?
>
> Christophe
>
>>
>> Christophe
>>>
>>>
>>>> Christophe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Christophe
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +void xor_altivec_3(unsigned long bytes, unsigned long *v1_in,
>>>>>>> +                            unsigned long *v2_in, unsigned long
>>>>>>> *v3_in);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +void xor_altivec_4(unsigned long bytes, unsigned long *v1_in,
>>>>>>> +                            unsigned long *v2_in, unsigned long
>>>>>>> *v3_in,
>>>>>>> +                            unsigned long *v4_in);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +void xor_altivec_5(unsigned long bytes, unsigned long *v1_in,
>>>>>>> +                            unsigned long *v2_in, unsigned long
>>>>>>> *v3_in,
>>>>>>> +                            unsigned long *v4_in, unsigned long
>>>>>>> *v5_in);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> L'absence de virus dans ce courrier =C3=A9lectronique a =C3=A9t=C3=
=A9 v=C3=A9rifi=C3=A9e par le
>>>>>> logiciel antivirus Avast.
>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
>