Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp233229imn; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 02:32:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+y4fYHgPXTn7UPZwHZlzDkqrRwDFgBBCopdr0flCNo8oprxJKs2wJFoxCTDVyE6TVsfvJ7 X-Received: by 10.98.5.71 with SMTP id 68mr2308499pff.241.1522229556493; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 02:32:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1522229556; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MyLHYvxEx1wonC3u2jWmqnBRRWPP3xcSjSk3vQDBxOd6Zdm6cVyvXGrdJiHgNI8Kwn 6/lbgz+pRliV6u0Pan1AEGLwnTKPhZPi5IpCiBy+hQLEJgKspkrQwOgFF9dPum0uzvZX vV1o/XuTNjOv0qZyz8mT79adgUPFX4j41Qhm8upD6NbNjD8UInH5etjlF/Z58E04Db6F Y/zlEOrHLwiuWFQGKdnqR2vgPbaAaxORHIT4Gu07ahfYnq3jInxpow33CLrspHqvd1vu SI4jmrNez0IuCEfG0uukJ5RAKWYEd+tkkoWzzcyjnYZEdRk3ok8t5WvgE+XvpsfBB2X9 VLmw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to :subject:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=yRCePfFzz20vp9ZWfk8oTxExaxUI+pPrgarL+BHgjBo=; b=hHIuh8J6/HvE+oqU4YdK1KWtVL2wNBc0MLbrWjsahzkSGJitlb3ZhL8IlY9QMnMlcN H0vjOUSyIhj2NE6CU1FU/eg/n6c+y4kBIZ0xh6uY81nM727wSGko/Zub5yPee6keaN+y tR4QDgCONosQycbZMNUsnYyejYD81GYEo69qmrWR+0KOU34h4/5KyFWoLg1WbLWo48eg pmXFozay5NBfCKLw8R7S6vx1aXgQeY70hNeiBhd84Cp3uSVM5id5Qn7/N3t3z+iuDBrI g4wgJzN7LKiTeuwSPWcr2+frPueE75G+NPOwnUiIgjuZEw8elbNcT4XKLoSnxEgyWr8u cJ9Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Ij5vRrBV; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o5-v6si3311984plh.432.2018.03.28.02.32.21; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 02:32:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Ij5vRrBV; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752663AbeC1J1D (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 28 Mar 2018 05:27:03 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f67.google.com ([209.85.214.67]:40128 "EHLO mail-it0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752613AbeC1J1B (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2018 05:27:01 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f67.google.com with SMTP id y20-v6so2774347itc.5 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 02:27:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yRCePfFzz20vp9ZWfk8oTxExaxUI+pPrgarL+BHgjBo=; b=Ij5vRrBV5k+5hsGul13fBaNtuM39SteqbS+egX6Z/IqLLKSagzodz+apXwKim+6kcI JNaSV3bCFkrC7rwCADvSQEmobpPVqASpr09rGN0sQNI6aL46+Yl7mDualf3lq1A58hjo MYUkLAgPTGjAe6f2DzTAsYAN3LhEaZ0OZVo2jFhMpbb4Y4fuTch31N4x6lmirMT5W/8J YJ9c61lxakqRpZsznyxa4E8PUXfQSkPopXZIowtcNqivRNNs1LMy/qN/zVBWcAhO0C2W 7mlLjUDv6kKLJFNFrBdrzuXhcWGdpjFpmr9R2czlxeZ4w70jJ1CESx7D72DFYZHnyG08 tlwA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yRCePfFzz20vp9ZWfk8oTxExaxUI+pPrgarL+BHgjBo=; b=cZ5CDrAhIlX6kMNw0JugW1LYl+w/9HCGULdDXjqYADo9B1eqMEevZ52R1+6O5vqVyE OeevdcKKSRGdP3QNCNY5VLUht491N/jVLIYyPjYg64xWp6dnpQr5OWxCrfiFkQVlChVY Rj8Znqn2mgqQC0Zxd1Gj5BwM922NWqhrLHFBLb1AJ2xVRnHalWKYBURxqOcfE/CQUBcy plU2CKJOa+4wQwH4tE1nlqNP28KovCoCJcHFi3n1jzi0+tyhJC1WXttONl/2nNeiZorF /TyZB7/o1pvPf7zq46kWJZ6iVPQxLM/L/ZVJ0COvwsGMsCGqe0JcdaXzQydZ8Tm/VKPs pZRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7FyzFxvqT6AZrNCri2QtmwA7XH5fzX86UGAzHVWDEL40Wm+8QkI u/yMRwP16xgyIIv+MKVQXww= X-Received: by 2002:a24:712:: with SMTP id f18-v6mr2742371itf.75.1522229220677; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 02:27:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (67.216.217.169.16clouds.com. [67.216.217.169]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o7sm2186075iob.63.2018.03.28.02.26.44 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Mar 2018 02:27:00 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: page_alloc: remain memblock_next_valid_pfn() when CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID is enable To: Daniel Vacek Cc: Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , Catalin Marinas , Mel Gorman , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Pavel Tatashin , Daniel Jordan , AKASHI Takahiro , Gioh Kim , Steven Sistare , Eugeniu Rosca , Vlastimil Babka , open list , linux-mm@kvack.org, James Morse , Ard Biesheuvel , Steve Capper , x86@kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kate Stewart , Philippe Ombredanne , Johannes Weiner , Kemi Wang , Petr Tesarik , YASUAKI ISHIMATSU , Andrey Ryabinin , Nikolay Borisov , Jia He References: <1521894282-6454-1-git-send-email-hejianet@gmail.com> <1521894282-6454-2-git-send-email-hejianet@gmail.com> From: Jia He Message-ID: <113cb8cf-7c59-4fbb-5ad2-4ae6eeb1193c@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:26:40 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/28/2018 12:52 AM, Daniel Vacek Wrote: > On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Jia He wrote: >> Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns >> where possible") optimized the loop in memmap_init_zone(). But it causes >> possible panic bug. So Daniel Vacek reverted it later. >> >> But memblock_next_valid_pfn is valid when CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID is >> enabled. And as verified by Eugeniu Rosca, arm can benifit from this >> commit. So remain the memblock_next_valid_pfn. > It is not dependent on CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID option but on > arm(64) implementation of pfn_valid() function, IIUC. So it should > really be moved from generic source file to arm specific location. I'd > say somewhere close to the pfn_valid() implementation. Such as to > arch/arm{,64}/mm/ init.c-ish? > > --nX Hi Daniel I didn't catch the reason why "It is not dependent on CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID option but on arm(64) implementation of pfn_valid() function"? Can you explain more about it? Thanks What's your thought if I changed the codes as followed? in include/linux/memblock.h #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID extern unsigned long memblock_next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn); #else #define memblock_next_valid_pfn(pfn) (pfn + 1) #endif Cheers, Jia > >> Signed-off-by: Jia He >> --- >> include/linux/memblock.h | 4 ++++ >> mm/memblock.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> mm/page_alloc.c | 11 ++++++++++- >> 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h >> index 0257aee..efbbe4b 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h >> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h >> @@ -203,6 +203,10 @@ void __next_mem_pfn_range(int *idx, int nid, unsigned long *out_start_pfn, >> i >= 0; __next_mem_pfn_range(&i, nid, p_start, p_end, p_nid)) >> #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP */ >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID >> +unsigned long memblock_next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn); >> +#endif >> + >> /** >> * for_each_free_mem_range - iterate through free memblock areas >> * @i: u64 used as loop variable >> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c >> index ba7c878..bea5a9c 100644 >> --- a/mm/memblock.c >> +++ b/mm/memblock.c >> @@ -1102,6 +1102,35 @@ void __init_memblock __next_mem_pfn_range(int *idx, int nid, >> *out_nid = r->nid; >> } >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID >> +unsigned long __init_memblock memblock_next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn) >> +{ >> + struct memblock_type *type = &memblock.memory; >> + unsigned int right = type->cnt; >> + unsigned int mid, left = 0; >> + phys_addr_t addr = PFN_PHYS(++pfn); >> + >> + do { >> + mid = (right + left) / 2; >> + >> + if (addr < type->regions[mid].base) >> + right = mid; >> + else if (addr >= (type->regions[mid].base + >> + type->regions[mid].size)) >> + left = mid + 1; >> + else { >> + /* addr is within the region, so pfn is valid */ >> + return pfn; >> + } >> + } while (left < right); >> + >> + if (right == type->cnt) >> + return -1UL; >> + else >> + return PHYS_PFN(type->regions[right].base); >> +} >> +#endif /*CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID*/ >> + >> /** >> * memblock_set_node - set node ID on memblock regions >> * @base: base of area to set node ID for >> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c >> index c19f5ac..2a967f7 100644 >> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c >> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c >> @@ -5483,8 +5483,17 @@ void __meminit memmap_init_zone(unsigned long size, int nid, unsigned long zone, >> if (context != MEMMAP_EARLY) >> goto not_early; >> >> - if (!early_pfn_valid(pfn)) >> + if (!early_pfn_valid(pfn)) { >> +#if (defined CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK) && (defined CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID) >> + /* >> + * Skip to the pfn preceding the next valid one (or >> + * end_pfn), such that we hit a valid pfn (or end_pfn) >> + * on our next iteration of the loop. >> + */ >> + pfn = memblock_next_valid_pfn(pfn) - 1; >> +#endif >> continue; >> + } >> if (!early_pfn_in_nid(pfn, nid)) >> continue; >> if (!update_defer_init(pgdat, pfn, end_pfn, &nr_initialised)) >> -- >> 2.7.4 >> -- Cheers, Jia