Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp346491imn; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 04:53:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/OwwL73Suk8jm57H62ffwIVlNHl9mYudVkHc60stKkjdtNh26YOxvRPf231nd9Ja+YUjLn X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9696:: with SMTP id n22-v6mr3489238plp.29.1522238036839; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 04:53:56 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1522238036; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dzxz1Qn0ZCIH1sALjyUCNgFjUZbItgex0mOt0nYMY2sKYHcDZX/SDiWWC1UalU0xro DqweaV7B1t249x/zOqRTRESynl9mu767pWTB/J1QASOcahO3MKzFeQKQey1pCcY+lP11 CrEGGbigGb7ZNGmluUf0E4L7fCP6JgOaFlq5d4ecePFMdQoQikheipD3suDAIYEqfULR e2hcPFq1BI+0ReYHANB4hcnAFLDnzntN3YEf09shjc78nzIaTRGDkAC5py0QHWz7JFLo YOW5jCnMuR1WXcYxYJDFFK7ott5DFPx4mzmaInFQLViRH6Dl+HjOD2vf8aMu35aOjREy QDIw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=LqoGvoDSt+q4DSDA7i3ccoCdBculEjryP4NQVcoTInQ=; b=zI+deNyp6KXXUuDNi6jF/37WPSDV5Y32p4qodSK+LlMRydZpRKsbtegZJCSQS3VBQY +NpwKM5NfieX+xBTN+P0xtf+mD+B6UObu1OGkbuEvx+32dGdJtKhcqZbGsGIFTyCVn6j GAZeA66NkBB+iIxjUH5vr0sE0PjmHfN4oJJTA1OIJsOMPfjzKuHBnL8mtCqLls9SACP3 +wsrHnW8o7fC8k0g5zuXsZw1+KczZjn3yId727UxNzPLDf3ldKygbrmv4QzZ6hzTW9Fx welBK6PN5IS4A31zGglze/BCpwcVi85NibarsXc2kIchwYUQT1N540tI2QJzRhbiVCQz pcFg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u70si2646464pfj.341.2018.03.28.04.53.42; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 04:53:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753146AbeC1LwF (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 28 Mar 2018 07:52:05 -0400 Received: from bastet.se.axis.com ([195.60.68.11]:54043 "EHLO bastet.se.axis.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753033AbeC1Lv0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2018 07:51:26 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bastet.se.axis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E506C18491; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:51:24 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at bastet.se.axis.com Received: from bastet.se.axis.com ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bastet.se.axis.com [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id eotzeOTvRrVT; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:51:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from boulder03.se.axis.com (boulder03.se.axis.com [10.0.8.17]) by bastet.se.axis.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73E991842F; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:51:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from boulder03.se.axis.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7781E076; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:51:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from boulder03.se.axis.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 503811E06C; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:51:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from seth.se.axis.com (unknown [10.0.2.172]) by boulder03.se.axis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:51:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lnxartpec1.se.axis.com (lnxartpec1.se.axis.com [10.88.4.10]) by seth.se.axis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42FBA20D7; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:51:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by lnxartpec1.se.axis.com (Postfix, from userid 20283) id 3F6A940197; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:51:22 +0200 (CEST) From: Niklas Cassel To: kishon@ti.com, cyrille.pitchen@free-electrons.com, Lorenzo Pieralisi , Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Niklas Cassel , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v5 10/12] PCI: endpoint: Make sure that BAR_5 does not have 64-bit flag set when clearing Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:50:15 +0200 Message-Id: <20180328115018.31921-11-niklas.cassel@axis.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.2 In-Reply-To: <20180328115018.31921-1-niklas.cassel@axis.com> References: <20180328115018.31921-1-niklas.cassel@axis.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Since a 64-bit BAR consists of a BAR pair, and since there is no BAR after BAR_5, BAR_5 cannot be 64-bits wide. This sanity check is done in pci_epc_clear_bar(), so that we don't need to do this sanity check in all epc->ops->clear_bar() implementations. Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel --- Kishon made a review comment that he wanted this: https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=152161168226203 Personally, I don't think that this check is needed, since pci_epc_set_bar() already does this check, and no one should modify the flags after pci_epc_set_bar() has been called. If everyone agrees, then this patch could be dropped. drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c index eccc942043cb..b0ee42739c3c 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c @@ -285,7 +285,9 @@ void pci_epc_clear_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, { unsigned long flags; - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions) + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions || + (epf_bar->barno == BAR_5 && + epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64)) return; if (!epc->ops->clear_bar) -- 2.14.2