Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp557758imn; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:33:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/B+zth8HbAG5ZB22ElugNW8+Ga5hOJBFP6PtfgTpfg9aN4CNpxoyrh75GKRbFVS3jZqQa3 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8ecb:: with SMTP id x11-v6mr4260666plo.402.1522251229378; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:33:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1522251229; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zOs9Kk5beiTWyXDfXC86zrhErQ1GHaoowGkOCO/lk9JPp2W/RJLhlq/2f8dBltDVHG 45Xniv7VZ1IrTJc+JevBVnm104fAWUkw/IIJ6HGVDax9AZnZIo8+htIHbNGUciUZ6Z5w ZhDmw4nF6eW8vnXH+7svLLflU+Kk2CTuj2Lc9oyqJ9zk1Dg8owvx/YSCIyqMrjNaRYl0 bT25eFC5WA2L5KApPF5G7qstfOjZh2Mfg3KTb/CUB+thytMJkI1Tww7Wrj14MTcmU0q2 8khvRkcYGGHnFlccWkVZYZl2WossgduDYaVQARTHbWKzJYSEnsz1XV9LKTtrYMWkv4/q ZfSg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=6SUbm4qkU3KP763o8Ltn8Xa0imc2H//bdQLXVTNx3Do=; b=X7PDh931GjgBxNYms5sIP1fVYZdgdEP/4BuGsMbQJkJ7StOOSyQLcru3F57XksOK3Y 3vKBe9xruVf/vilhFePL4eZdYiGhT+SpmfhPL6ItEJazJSVPW7WUAGgRQuwRSniBkm+J k3jqBidPyDc75Sr8qEmuaNsNr3ehOLsIv09fzOftP/F80HhUXBoD5vwF908C94HRKQXp 94xByt/E9WYr7g6OLZNwbnvW6P3QZtN2hmP0329r+R0NbETR64oTKmPaMlkZnR2RLa8E odZ4Vr3MoxpJRdytlgbLyolDebn/0yTGAthomGllEnRE2mg0CVJy05/cwO0Cq9KFj5Gi deeA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k14si2593868pgt.32.2018.03.28.08.33.22; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:33:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754057AbeC1Pbi (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 28 Mar 2018 11:31:38 -0400 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:38425 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753691AbeC1Pbh (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2018 11:31:37 -0400 Received: by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id D687B20722; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:31:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.bootlin.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from localhost (unknown [37.71.171.242]) by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 878922037A; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:31:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:31:35 +0200 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: Alexander Dahl , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Boris Brezillon , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] clocksource: rework Atmel TCB timer driver Message-ID: <20180328153135.GG13942@piout.net> References: <20180223171558.7037-1-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> <9761072.pX2B0LJlSJ@ada> <989df8a3-462a-c645-87f1-9f956e1b22c9@linaro.org> <4073350.0MmxRoANOi@ada> <6d43177a-bbea-6a01-5fa5-1c7891e18412@linaro.org> <20180328141645.GF13942@piout.net> <75e5917b-a9ba-c67e-e964-3f002681f9bb@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <75e5917b-a9ba-c67e-e964-3f002681f9bb@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 28/03/2018 at 16:36:34 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 28/03/2018 16:16, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > On 28/03/2018 at 15:03:11 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > >> On 28/03/2018 12:29, Alexander Dahl wrote: > >>> Hello Daniel, > >>> > >>> Am Dienstag, 27. M?rz 2018, 13:30:22 CEST schrieb Daniel Lezcano: > >>>> Can you can give a rough amount for the irq rate on the timer ? > >>> > >>> I used itop [1] now to get a rough estimate. First with kernel v4.14.29-rt25 > >>> (fully preempt RT): > >>> > >>> INT NAME RATE MAX > >>> 19 [ vel tc_clkevt] 397 Ints/s (max: 432) > >>> 26 [ vel eth0] 4 Ints/s (max: 38) > >>> > >>> Next test with kernel v4.15.13 gives (slightly slower, but non-RT): > >>> > >>> INT NAME RATE MAX > >>> 19 [ vel tc_clkevt] 248 Ints/s (max: 273) > >>> 26 [ vel eth0] 4 Ints/s (max: 11) > >>> > >>> With kernel v4.16-rc7 plus this patch series and tcb as clocksource: > >>> > >>> INT NAME RATE MAX > >>> 17 [vel timer@fffa] 2164 Ints/s (max: 2183) > >>> 26 [ vel eth0] 5 Ints/s (max: 10) > >>> > >>> Is this the information you wanted? If not, could you point me on how to get > >>> the requested irq rate? > >> > >> It is perfect. Thanks! > >> > >> It confirms what I was worried about: the clocksource wraps up too > >> quickly thus raising an interrupt every 400us. That is why I asked > >> Alexande about a prescalar register. > >> > > > > The code should behave exactly the same between the previous and the new > > driver. The interrupt is not coming from the clocksource but from the > > clockevent and it is already on the slowest clock, the 32kHz one. > > Do you have an explanation of why the rate is much higher ? > The core is giving deltas of 31 clocks instead of much more than that, I guess I messed up the initialization somewhere. -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com