Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp1141665imn; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 21:56:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+R1Q/S2e9Olavv+j4Oaq/66yqVrDkCTrdD0YMRE+KWW8yqIiuDegysb3DWLUyFB0+lwCh5 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:20ca:: with SMTP id v10-v6mr6853503plg.9.1522299401100; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 21:56:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1522299401; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=i5CzWshDi6Egq2B6bNZDxO/XBFkGim7jqR4LvJUJ+bCwAGvfD2hl3dLd9hP3G1FL1v g6dTX5eCyNhtBCPwrHQGu5eNDCgxfQtaz+x9KYVezoeuAfzkCDvQGPJVtP0Izu8V0wlL tEwRKU2BD4t22d7KwqPDuWcQOt+Yy+oTnbgkFWO+VSdVfl3txV4lJOqyo1elqVmlyXIF H2x9wDEHrCJ93xbIWFYuxkKy4dKMCtThbXmxrmo/F9MGWmTD6Kalc/DKcjKmPpG35Hm2 cVgEAzvO45mjP1/6sIjCzVMgMkgYpAaRzW23SNr9v79QXUpMlry1ZPlc+ldNhPoNkB0/ SXBg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=JrvNSFMC0z1GmZ1sp3ZMSwFeb+tcKdEAruid/Xs7iQ8=; b=rpaGsMdHVJyf4DV1ZtWD/bGnZrgS4NFIuZDotwXwdlKQioKHHb6xDALEN0FcR2jInj Zr+wsjYrGRc1nepr6ubDcIs6JIVdu74OLqX2cIz5ZyTJk4A5lYd7G3V29gEVIfQCnS6u PIUCpMC+wjijMICeZu9iVYUgJ0AdsKXyOYeJxXAJd2k4PnEQgmlgD/HjW9Bh9R8EZbnv wcJOJERexmFKS3DTGw2Rr4q4/dfxOLUzx/mI5rI7l60LUBTOaae8gQrC9FVtMJup2BYe iJ8UU/tv4a+kLI+nyImSK0DWSow5iPE8zc5nAV45FCbLqcQ03/jLKSvO3JgLDtHMlVY/ +Z0Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e6si3425995pgt.198.2018.03.28.21.55.57; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 21:56:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752128AbeC2EyC (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 29 Mar 2018 00:54:02 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:35274 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751146AbeC2EyB (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2018 00:54:01 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w2T4oaRU095887 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 00:54:00 -0400 Received: from e15.ny.us.ibm.com (e15.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.205]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2h0sfn02qf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA256 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 00:54:00 -0400 Received: from localhost by e15.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 00:53:59 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.28) by e15.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.202) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 00:53:54 -0400 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w2T4rr5M786820; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 04:53:53 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3097B2058; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 01:56:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (unknown [9.85.178.48]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A468BB2052; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 01:56:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CCA4C16C34C2; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:33:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:33:16 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Alan Stern , schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, parri.andrea@gmail.com, will.deacon@arm.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, npiggin@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com, j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk, luc.maranget@inria.fr, akiyks@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tools/memory-model] Add s390.{cfg,cat} Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20180328134232.GA29274@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180328175136.GL4082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180328175136.GL4082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18032904-0036-0000-0000-000002D89F73 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00008763; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000255; SDB=6.01009946; UDB=6.00514528; IPR=6.00789225; MB=3.00020304; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-03-29 04:53:58 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18032904-0037-0000-0000-000043CC695A Message-Id: <20180329013316.GU3675@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2018-03-29_03:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1803290054 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 07:51:36PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:01:25AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > I don't quite see the point of this. You're not suggesting that we > > have one Linux Kernel Memory Consistency Model for s390 and another > > one for all the other architectures, are you? > > > > If the idea is merely to provide a herd model for s390 then it should > > go into the DIY repository, not into the LKMM repository. > > I suspect the use-case was validating s390 arch code which might not > have followed all the regular linux rules because they know its TSO. But > yes, I'm tempted to agree that even arch specific code ought to follow > the regular rules, just to avoid completely messing up the reader. Another use case is testing an s390 .cat file without having to teach herd about s390 assembly. ;-) Thanx, Paul