Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp1525259imn; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:22:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49Lq49NbZW65Mt3eKNrd2hjc71m5mWyNCwt2IaHfcisDKj/UN9Ut0UZG9+bmv4Ag3JypAs+ X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:146:: with SMTP id 64-v6mr8317677plb.30.1522329756067; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:22:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1522329756; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=o53pDp4HQdv1BZkbMHKH5S3V6iRyuMr8jiyv7fd5KviLkDCjBchOokT8bmXv+ikve0 Hix1UMmMoiGSJta8AOM2+Fq2ZLL2nFaUODiJwWBYQ3VRVxb/KHh59gF/ieS4Pk/jU3Ne 4cyGmGT2COw+dJI5MhfzVVjcuFUvTkRFBaccbv+MkwjuvzDynF6JwWyd1FW3PA9EONOd JACdVNNC/ENkN+APFPMgtZFKHT0naT1G/62bQoc1Lp8LKCG9exmLmfp97CCLn8Bemh0V kY7lYe7/vnzdpaQldkhenytqfgr7wAGVF2pAbpVGo2AQPmc3SRIxnKI5bcVl3fVbCSYT 2D0A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=+SMPA/PwUjwjnAbgzbKSq2QCHgiMYjcZ+JMfCT/W2e4=; b=nwRKFoZyC4ryHEthGfZk7Qo6/J7jSgVnZMIA5NDL47uupJ4qwHZRd8D1H8boqT+w4w /w5/UoUd8kITIG78LNZBhWWGvspEdeiWcteS2yv2RedbKCF40mDH/LBBxRJM+bB5uTvE 9MiN/bHJ9YHvYawem83+HtqLwIwl6y7K27mGZZFKj5gSw5c1IHa27KlhGuA/vK3URsQJ YlnkoP2o5kzIxRMUruvLI24KM97yb48vzd2qPRLqVp30mNpSXZ7P2iWscfxF866jouwy lwu9YRP7oA6TPsBDXCEmADNtTjYIh2fc3hM05jpMgIU3//SMxuWkRLhlTX0L/dDA9pPM HGxQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o17si3989560pge.787.2018.03.29.06.22.21; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:22:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752752AbeC2NUC (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 29 Mar 2018 09:20:02 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:39851 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751211AbeC2NUA (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2018 09:20:00 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40Blj41H3Xz9s15; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 00:19:51 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au From: Michael Ellerman To: Shea Levy , Joe Perches , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michal Hocko , Vlastimil Babka , Andrew Morton , Dan Williams , Christophe Leroy , Oliver O'Halloran , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/16] powerpc: Use generic free_initrd_mem. In-Reply-To: <874lkzudkc.fsf@xps13.shealevy.com> References: <20180328152714.6103-1-shea@shealevy.com> <20180328203659.18692-1-shea@shealevy.com> <20180328203659.18692-15-shea@shealevy.com> <1522269853.12357.135.camel@perches.com> <874lkzudkc.fsf@xps13.shealevy.com> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 00:19:40 +1100 Message-ID: <87a7ur10k3.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Shea Levy writes: > Joe Perches writes: > >> On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 16:36 -0400, Shea Levy wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Shea Levy >> >> Most people seem to want some form of commit message >> and not just your sign-off. >> > > Ah, if the subject is insufficient I can add some more detail. Yeah please do. Seeing this patch in isolation, with no change log, I might think it's safe for me to just apply it. But that would break the build because I don't have patch 1. So for starters you need to explain that part, eg something like: A previous patch in the series added a weak definition of free_initrd_mem() in init/initramfs.c. The powerpc implementation is identical, so it can be removed allowing the generic version to be used. Then you could also tell me if you did/didn't build/boot test it. cheers