Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S275403AbTHNRR2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:17:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S275405AbTHNRR2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:17:28 -0400 Received: from mail.jlokier.co.uk ([81.29.64.88]:53376 "EHLO mail.jlokier.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S275403AbTHNRRX (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:17:23 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 18:17:03 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: john stultz Cc: timothy parkinson , lkml Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test3 "loosing ticks" Message-ID: <20030814171703.GA10889@mail.jlokier.co.uk> References: <20030813014735.GA225@timothyparkinson.com> <1060793667.10731.1437.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1060793667.10731.1437.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1004 Lines: 25 john stultz wrote: > Sounds like either your PIT is running slowly or something is > consistently keeping the timer interrupt from being handled. In 2.4 do > you have any time related issues at all? Does the "Loosing too many > ticks!" message correlate to any event on the system (boot, heavy load)? > > Also listing system type, motherboard, any sort of funky devices you've > got might be helpful. I am seeing something similar on my dual Athlon MP 1800 box. It is running NTP to synchronise with another machine over the LAN, but ntpdc reports that it develops a larger and larger offset relative to the server - ntpd clearly is not managing to regulate the clock. It does not have this problem with 2.4 - the time synchronises perfectly. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/