Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S274922AbTHNScI (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:32:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S275018AbTHNScI (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:32:08 -0400 Received: from [63.226.249.57] ([63.226.249.57]:55239 "EHLO nymph.dleonard.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S274922AbTHNScD (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:32:03 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 11:53:02 -0700 (PDT) From: To: Mark Watts cc: Subject: Re: Via KT400 agpgart issues In-Reply-To: <200308141025.12747.m.watts@eris.qinetiq.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2435 Lines: 73 For my geforce3 and geforce4 I didn't notice anything odd about using the KT400 chipset in spite of agpgart not fully supporting it. For my fx5800 I actually *had* to use the nvidia agp driver to get anything other than console mode to function. Now it could be that I just needed to drop the AGP rate to 4x in bios but frankly I didn't think of that option until I'd already switched to using the nvidia code. The nvidia agp code has been behaving quite well under 2.4.20 and 2.4.22-pre* for me. -- On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Mark Watts wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Ok, I _am_ using the nVidia modules (on 2.4.21) but the fact that the agpgart > driver can't sense my agp apature size is concerning... (its set to 256MB in > the bios) > > 0: nvidia: loading NVIDIA Linux x86 nvidia.o Kernel Module 1.0-4496 Wed Jul > 16 19:03:09 PDT 2003 > Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann > agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 439M > agpgart: Detected Via Apollo Pro KT400 chipset > agpgart: unable to determine aperture size. > 0: NVRM: AGPGART: unable to retrieve symbol table > > I'm running a GeForce FX 5600 128Mb with AGP 3.0 support enabled. > It seems to run ok, but its slower than the Ti 4200-4x I took out by a larger > margin than it really should be (according to the benchmarks I've seen > scattered through the internet.) > I'm also running with the Local APIC turned on (it doesnt seem to break > anything). > > Is anything actually broken or is this nothing to worry about? > > Cheers, > > Mark. > > - -- > Mark Watts > Senior Systems Engineer > QinetiQ TIM > St Andrews Road, Malvern > GPG Public Key ID: 455420ED > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD4DBQE/O1V4Bn4EFUVUIO0RAu0VAJip/2qWkG6e6uc/YVYKD5u2f6RwAJ9msH9y > y1VIT2ZaUL5dCQPGoRvjTg== > =a21r > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/