Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp111898imn; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 01:56:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx485/Gq/MXE6r2KJLYiLFD8nOWF1a57Hy3Q+8cfcVPoBRNXNRVbpY6q6gF5Ol88iUOOVVyuP X-Received: by 10.99.164.18 with SMTP id c18mr7886228pgf.85.1522400191639; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 01:56:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1522400191; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=q6T322azuqLzgyuB+sruMWlTvkWyYf9oJmxl3aZCv2dVT0QnWEsPD5CsrzBW8GTqFH a2PcyhGDjLq3hPMiSqP3XBTWvwhqH/itXKtPcD3P61i2iYIaBSYZP0DEyT5mJc+W+CxT bk9qo5ZNzXvmRQHHqsNuw7UmlVCmyfmq5aZcYA+RnMYcDaqX24Y+rFxlwJGKTehce1cH YioAtDXKdHKSk26wXNzFbcCfBw8CnU1x97B07xr6x4ZQQJydR2hI73tXZdOElkDr9CgZ uCJxSlBkU7VbFngl5Xt0hPCzuw4fAuo23KZbpL19vsLjCqyHub831JLxwZEX4oE19NkF oh5Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:date:message-id:subject:from:cc:to :arc-authentication-results; bh=oKTppUK3A9UQkG/SKXEGZqSPbOdQb24t07Q9aEll2rE=; b=jEK0Ak8Bk7ZNK19v1j/Xd6rd5U2q9gRalh6hoFrW76V2MDC5j77pH4pZqC5aNY+brx cK8porGOvN2ina+DaehvFokm8R4fq7Hf/C5VmwID+rBE51Lv7gNBzl635E48GwmwgVFK CPCz8Zn0fvZM7LDAoEJh43CdvQGwjfzsKawZb/k66IsuVgHwe1NsYGkKfT5A39Hcveo1 bNPTscky2j9nahUYPZcXd7BFLrys4C2x2VmMRMEfMccfmqp2tUxwdEqRSNaav+KsXBXL MIkeUj6JaV/cSm6dX53tkHFVGUtNxuBUf+8LvKNuf9eKo/Cm2lmG8e7zt5TQXfKoOZC0 L7Cw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s29si5361313pgn.23.2018.03.30.01.56.17; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 01:56:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751167AbeC3IzE (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 30 Mar 2018 04:55:04 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:6713 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750831AbeC3IzC (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Mar 2018 04:55:02 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS405-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 20FB31A11A16B; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 16:54:37 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.177.16.168) by DGGEMS405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.361.1; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 16:54:37 +0800 To: Andrew Morton , Eric Van Hensbergen , Ron Minnich , Latchesar Ionkov , Greg Kurz , CC: , , From: jiangyiwen Subject: [RFC] About 9pfs support "O_DIRECT + aio"? Message-ID: <5ABDFB24.1080207@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 16:53:56 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.16.168] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi everyone, Currently, I found virtio-9p in VirtFS don't support "O_DIRECT + aio" mode, both v9fs and qemu. So when user use "O_DIRECT + aio" mode and increase iodepths, they can't get higher IOPS. I want to know why v9fs don't implement this mode? And I will try to implement this mode from now on. Thanks, Yiwen.