Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp31443imn; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 13:34:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48F0PXCwFODvd12RwNX2Vkn3dKK3SwYH77lb9yw4jFo5B1Xb4dQqfd4c/A+AhZy4/zZmfba X-Received: by 10.101.76.207 with SMTP id n15mr290410pgt.313.1522442062306; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 13:34:22 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1522442062; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HZuHtokPMAnbLvTIQuCsv+XavmYHypVpYJ7fj3aRNm8zaDitiBv7lcxNQcqGCMNxS7 pjTmoGeYFSFhQe6OTZqi13dQX+JBNPa81ueDShLtJZpBBeZaw3lZE3N5NCm5Kd6nmzVY aFmLJG4jz5XqYkjIF/+k0wDkSfNM1/wbRUZdTD9Z/wOmXW5imLQ8UieaLlJEV/rk4g6W h8srPVU56FYmtjgkRmoUZQDYYKP5kQ++kQleYJcckJ3tV0cp/FsMJtRrVu9OyAhAky+E iC3yGZvYwGCue3g+8jlj6jjKClcSmHVvbv56FqU4mqexpIYvHC+JRbfcPPJU7WWhOzvK Sv6w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=hRnsOK9eBV3WetmPsLnO9O7I7N/JzggQWtNFryIixLE=; b=dDPLHdA5APva1LINJhsDSVECJki539ESgPxrtbiZLcYvk9n4SoMxGiy6Qqw3ehxRm/ D7jTQ0p3+BctXi8Y0yhz/7KNh8dws5wZe2jE79iKCbEMXwiCll/ojqsj96y7/RYEXlBA OqDli+qgaWiQtxzkg+R1Jnn7de8zgso7TphVpnQvAEoqJKQiEShyGYQB1InR+AXvqOWF uUKJ6TUvhNkGa4StqLnsiyD7D+jCitsFLva+nqG3lT+DJ+hp3ZQMN9XoK68yX5pzKApk X42q0o4REL6kRcERr4YVs0XcgPY7PU409q4Oqomod3zeipFpoGeq+XE5RO9Ar+FxEqB4 nR5Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q2si523921pga.198.2018.03.30.13.34.07; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 13:34:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752730AbeC3Ucw (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 30 Mar 2018 16:32:52 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:56315 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752206AbeC3Ucv (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Mar 2018 16:32:51 -0400 Received: from p4fea5f09.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([79.234.95.9] helo=nanos.glx-home) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1f20hY-0005OF-OC; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 22:32:44 +0200 Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 22:32:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Dave Hansen cc: Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mm , Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Lutomirski , Kees Cook , Hugh Dickins , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?J=FCrgen_Gro=DF?= , the arch/x86 maintainers , namit@vmware.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Use global pages with PTI In-Reply-To: <3cdc23a2-99eb-6f93-6934-f7757fa30a3e@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: References: <20180323174447.55F35636@viggo.jf.intel.com> <20180327200719.lvdomez6hszpmo4s@gmail.com> <0d6ea030-ec3b-d649-bad7-89ff54094e25@linux.intel.com> <20180330120920.btobga44wqytlkoe@gmail.com> <20180330121725.zcklh36ulg7crydw@gmail.com> <3cdc23a2-99eb-6f93-6934-f7757fa30a3e@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 30 Mar 2018, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 03/30/2018 05:17 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > BTW., the expectation on !PCID Intel hardware would be for global pages to help > > even more than the 0.6% and 1.7% you measured on PCID hardware: PCID already > > _reduces_ the cost of TLB flushes - so if there's not even PCID then global pages > > should help even more. > > > > In theory at least. Would still be nice to measure it. > > I did the lseek test on a modern, non-PCID system: > > No Global pages (baseline): 6077741 lseeks/sec > 94 Global pages (this set): 8433111 lseeks/sec > +2355370 lseeks/sec (+38.8%) That's all kernel text, right? What's the result for the case where global is only set for all user/kernel shared pages? Thanks, tglx