Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S275795AbTHOIqj (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Aug 2003 04:46:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S275796AbTHOIqj (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Aug 2003 04:46:39 -0400 Received: from iv.ro ([194.105.28.94]:36992 "HELO iv.ro") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S275795AbTHOIqj (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Aug 2003 04:46:39 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 12:01:45 +0300 From: Jani Monoses To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: separate kbuild objdir status? Message-Id: <20030815120145.4337d688.jani@iv.ro> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.3 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 467 Lines: 14 Hi is Sam's separate objdir patch or any other patch accomplishing the goal of being able to build various kernels using a single source tree considered too disruptive or unimportant for the 2.6-test series? thanks Jani - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/