Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp3218399imn; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 00:34:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48wuClOdqUCFA3RP1tcMpcWHhSgaLedcpsYJ1rnRspA3l65Hj9cfTcO2jloozAfl2eG/og7 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:3e5:: with SMTP id d92-v6mr13330007pld.104.1522740851146; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:34:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1522740851; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sYX7LTCzx1z/yZ4L5wipeOEn4L5i/UqaZQG3ygicZBuNzjLYZmNEqS1A2N54Nd5V1A L8DY4tN5N0CESFRNecUyLa8m3QDhA7CXtJ8pu0000v15R4P3FQQjTnTZtbHQik0wHayK WxrwxGNwn6uBfSXRNATXOzYDTu3FP0fyhBUBKo+l5k12YrGOE5gpXa8eS2NTh86gx6kX abK7Ao0gWDktWU7nQFn6hWhFVV67jY2pwgpEzNtjw+VR9PqkzMrXmX+fQWSBkMHo5hRt H1nBgPfjc8NpXMPuLwWUpXUM3aaph4zSp4PafwPQnP0vnL4fK4cH+cMBiqzHYq4aXk3S kUqA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=FRfz4EfKWE8Y0dnnV3nUH35AUQcf/0jXJeAPMz5YRaQ=; b=pdE0hbMx7muOObLzRZ9lbYQlZQ2etk4hPCye5cqdPpvRx/P9Qqjg9NPkAlL4ifowEP p9IcbruCIJKUnfBMkwW7SBnudfLLoHPd0IbGrioaCIoko4gnkrnZsHZ+N2knpjB5N/gd /pJtMzVKnB1xo5fzlOxQYBlmMyfDLAg04BCkcKDIWnxFcMBQaIMNE9sJP9/bR7TOyDu3 +e0lHOW047YEfLGMcaJ3CBj+KkCr9ZqXzMAA+ONpK8P8py/SiHcBJcGEOixvcCUcfyq1 xbYLNpgbZ4BSjQpP4W8ymJMT+HxwR9ieGXnFY5L1MrG9x40QXmjNfdVH1Zo94K7TlghX gYzw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g6-v6si2193243pll.677.2018.04.03.00.33.56; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:34:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754835AbeDCHcc (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 3 Apr 2018 03:32:32 -0400 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:37723 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754690AbeDCHcb (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Apr 2018 03:32:31 -0400 Received: by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 2DA6E2071F; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 09:32:30 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.bootlin.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT, URIBL_BLOCKED shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from bbrezillon (91-160-177-164.subs.proxad.net [91.160.177.164]) by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3D0C20713; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 09:32:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 09:32:29 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Peter Rosin Cc: Alexandre Belloni , Richard Weinberger , Josh Wu , Nicolas Ferre , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marek Vasut , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Cyrille Pitchen , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: raw: atmel: add module param to avoid using dma Message-ID: <20180403093229.66dd1dcf@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <20180403091522.1a498544@bbrezillon> References: <20180329131054.22506-1-peda@axentia.se> <20180329153322.5e2fc1e7@bbrezillon> <20180329154416.5c1a0013@bbrezillon> <20180402142249.7e076a64@bbrezillon> <20180402212843.164d5d21@bbrezillon> <20180402222020.1d344c14@bbrezillon> <20180403091522.1a498544@bbrezillon> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 09:15:22 +0200 Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > > to > > > > 0 33--3--3--3333-- > > 1 33--3--3--3333-- > > 2 33-------------- > > 3 -3--------333--- > > 4 33-------------- > > 5 3--------------- > > 6 33--33-33333333- > > 7 --1-1--3-------- > > 8 -1---1--3--3---- > > Why do you change priority on slave 7 and 8 (AKA DDR port 0 and 1)? > They don't seem to be used by the LCDC. > > > 9 --1-1--3-33-333- > > Shouldn't we have > > 9 -1---1--3--1---- > > here? Never mind. I just read the email where you explain the datasheet vs reality mismatch after this one. I guess we'll have to wait for a Nicolas' feedback here. -- Boris Brezillon, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com