Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp3332124imn; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 03:04:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/3ZwWzbs+l/ounB/zRhBJ6nTfFSC6UVxGZajjw6K34EFo2TpYDpxJHe66PCt3ej+MC39oV X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9a48:: with SMTP id x8-v6mr13330228plv.135.1522749898313; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 03:04:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1522749898; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=niRfRBu/iXhWlcDE8N5W1nGQHQeD8huQjmSm4XoAaUnQapS+68L429QkJFjsNm0PSh 8lPB9CN2TlgEfGFR/snpNAXS16wcSBPE3kdQFJBO4EArqFZJ9n4dbdaAuCH6mdOWBvyZ H2rtQPiItaDWztj1woyfHDH9DqKcgKSzcyOfmVQweVCHT+HK+VbJTaP01d+9efO/1+BS TGPxcT5rTEFGFAXDxTNBP9HS9gRpe82WxkRA/7pubr1aWwvC9pEm57AIAzZD56cpjI4F MBVR/HFLdFnNxjCjTTxegImtppyDTW+apcfzs5Fnw4L5QfzZvG618bwGC8vTx8uWNWC2 BM+g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :organization:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=v85XUCr91D/4E3F/kLzO9i0hp6fj8jCDX/ATGTBDrTM=; b=QbcOUaLhcrIE8b6ZP6kEK7vz9s1Kt0xDHeR/WgH3rdbbUCjEhpPVWMzTmxXvA0Hrlm LIv7RlBq7EBs0vbAdDjEpxReM2A2jxIzH8EItfZoEwVBtAm/95MbzazKwuZXKdH3N3vL uL1W9YlIoaR4cpTF2238umx0QqQlPwZJdFsgm2rA8hS1/12qs9vDIOPRwFMHy/Y/SNu6 iXhclYBSmK4Zj9uckwM1wNnOYxbKZFb3r4YFdf1Nk5hXrj4OzvCuhSnssC7MQg0EZSB5 OpNYazTX+nv1iA9b+bNonHylWyiRHFEILZUoh21ZmC/LztKoI8NTwiflIuOjPVSp/3Bs JufA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f21si1701682pgn.693.2018.04.03.03.04.44; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 03:04:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755103AbeDCKDh (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 3 Apr 2018 06:03:37 -0400 Received: from mga17.intel.com ([192.55.52.151]:61160 "EHLO mga17.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753222AbeDCKDf (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Apr 2018 06:03:35 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Apr 2018 03:03:35 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,400,1517904000"; d="scan'208";a="43593035" Received: from jnikula-mobl2.fi.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.237.72.62]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Apr 2018 03:03:32 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: Julia Lawall Cc: Colin King , Alex Deucher , Christian =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=B6nig?= , David Zhou , David Airlie , Harry Wentland , amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: fix spelling mistake: "Usupported" -> "Unsupported" In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20180330160047.7368-1-colin.king@canonical.com> <87tvssaawl.fsf@intel.com> Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 13:04:22 +0300 Message-ID: <87o9j0a9nd.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 03 Apr 2018, Julia Lawall wrote: > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018, Jani Nikula wrote: >> Please do consider limiting the distribution in the future, >> though. There's no need to include lkml or even dri-devel for trivial >> patches like this. > > It's complex to have to remember the preferences for every subsystem. > Preferences should be expressed in the MAINTAINERS file in some way. They are; it's just that get_maintainer.pl has silly defaults. There's no reason it should include the full chain from the leaf driver to the subsystem to the LKML by default, with a bunch of authors and commit signers on top. Especially so for supported drivers. I'm surprised it doesn't include Linus by default. > Also, since no one reads lkml, does it hurt to have even trivial patches? Heh. Let's just say I care more about dri-devel. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center