Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:16:18 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc:     Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
        "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm: consider non-anonymous thp as unmovable page
Message-ID: <20180403111618.o2w44gtcfzvu3yjv@node.shutemov.name>
References: <1522730788-24530-1-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
 <20180403075928.GC5501@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20180403082405.GA23809@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
 <20180403083451.GG5501@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20180403105411.hknofkbn6rzs26oz@node.shutemov.name>
 <20180403105815.GL5501@dhcp22.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180403105815.GL5501@dhcp22.suse.cz>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180223
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 12:58:15PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 03-04-18 13:54:11, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 10:34:51AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Tue 03-04-18 08:24:06, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 09:59:28AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > > On Tue 03-04-18 13:46:28, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > > > > > My testing for the latest kernel supporting thp migration found out an
> > > > > > infinite loop in offlining the memory block that is filled with shmem
> > > > > > thps.  We can get out of the loop with a signal, but kernel should
> > > > > > return with failure in this case.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What happens in the loop is that scan_movable_pages() repeats returning
> > > > > > the same pfn without any progress. That's because page migration always
> > > > > > fails for shmem thps.
> > > > >
> > > > > Why does it fail? Shmem pages should be movable without any issues.
> > > > 
> > > > .. because try_to_unmap_one() explicitly skips unmapping for migration.
> > > > 
> > > >   #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION
> > > >                   /* PMD-mapped THP migration entry */
> > > >                   if (!pvmw.pte && (flags & TTU_MIGRATION)) {
> > > >                           VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageHuge(page) || !PageTransCompound(page), page);
> > > >   
> > > >                           if (!PageAnon(page))
> > > >                                   continue;
> > > >   
> > > >                           set_pmd_migration_entry(&pvmw, page);
> > > >                           continue;
> > > >                   }
> > > >   #endif
> > > > 
> > > > When I implemented this code, I felt hard to work on both of anon thp
> > > > and shmem thp at one time, so I separated the proposal into smaller steps.
> > > > Shmem uses pagecache so we need some non-trivial effort (including testing)
> > > > to extend thp migration for shmem. But I think it's a reasonable next step.
> > > 
> > > OK, I see. I have forgot about this part. Please be explicit about that
> > > in the changelog. Also the proper fix is to not use movable zone for
> > > shmem page THP rather than hack around it in the hotplug specific code
> > > IMHO.
> > 
> > No. We should just split the page before running
> > try_to_unmap(TTU_MIGRATION) on the page.
> 
> If splitting is a preffered way then I do not have any objection. We
> just cannot keep unmovable objects in the zone movable.

We had anon-thp in movable zone for ages, long before THP migration was
implemented.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov