Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269461AbTHORIk (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Aug 2003 13:08:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270496AbTHORIk (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Aug 2003 13:08:40 -0400 Received: from hermine.idb.hist.no ([158.38.50.15]:61194 "HELO hermine.idb.hist.no") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S269461AbTHORGk (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Aug 2003 13:06:40 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 19:14:05 +0200 To: Felipe Alfaro Solana Cc: LKML Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test3-mm1 interactivity scheduling mistakes (smp) Message-ID: <20030815171405.GA925@hh.idb.hist.no> References: <20030813180020.GA1339@hh.idb.hist.no> <1060798101.603.47.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1060798101.603.47.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Helge Hafting Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1835 Lines: 41 On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 08:08:21PM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 20:00, Helge Hafting wrote: > > I ran a "nice make -j3 bzImage" on 2.6.9-test3-mm1 in order > > to compile 2.6.0-test3-mm2 on my dual celeron. > > > > While waiting I played cuyo, a lightweight game similiar to tetris. > > > > This mostly behaved as expected, with a responsive game. > > But mozilla (on some other virtual desktop) occationally > > refreshed its page, causing several seconds with jerky response > > in the game. > > > > This is wrong for two reasons: > > 1. There should be enough cpu with two processors, > > one running the game and another the heavy mozilla stuff. > > The make was niced after all. No guessing, I told it explicitly. > > > > 2. The game has very interactive behaviour, it uses 4-10% cpu > > and cause X to use about 20%. Mozilla may have been idle for a > > while, getting "interactive". But it shouldn't remain > > interactive for so long, it sat at 100% till it went > > idle again. > > > > X runs with elevated priority, (std. debian testing setup) > > but that shouldn't matter - X only used 20% and that was > > for the game and two xterms. Mozilla wasn't visible > > at all. > > I can't tell you why, but for me, X behaves horribly if it's not reniced > exactly at +0. In the past, I reniced X at -20, but Con told me that > with O??int patches, X must/should work with no nicing at all. > > Could you please try again with X not reniced? I tried again with X not reniced - and it failed the same way. Helge Hafting - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/