Received: by 10.213.65.68 with SMTP id h4csp3935671imn; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:22:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49R5biCd0roo/vQcS1udfBRqS77sQkLjYzMKec+d1A2mHCbE1cn1ZJyJUjkc83vHCJnW3CR X-Received: by 10.101.93.2 with SMTP id e2mr9991082pgr.100.1522786964936; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 13:22:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1522786964; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LkkZs55ot4TCLMrUqGPdtS6yY5P9wjB2FQrNN5hVHcwcJgEr7obExPRbVfrBzePizA GUqkwdt+FCRZ7rPhEVA7gn+WeCVD5cAFR/vTinnRPx7xoSc8d+shHz8WZVehKdpHjpGc G9OCYKIZGF08T4onzzShwu7lKwGD9FyPS1IslI+X3j8meOGylBlNxWbjL9BJ3uO1G8qK x1ZobNjIy/hJigz4bO+incYe0N3NthDUEYXLlUm+TsN2RPnL0+cfEyFu7eampf8vMYRJ y7XGvruzFvFofnFayhvA0vG5kqskocYYpycA2k0mnlnmt1A8TiBubJoAwAsoSfFykth9 Y86g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:arc-authentication-results; bh=WTgnfHJSg+xUrBOE4rnO6eOPDECKnTc+BzKKovmRuog=; b=hO8v1qDrm0KdajLPUFODRKj1ooSUBoL1znLvBzc+rbbKbpKHgVaxzgL8Le4EjhOrXU 1IsbI97vaPZ+80cbACBdXXOUA4gqOP4Brrvq0qSPwxlWoewvaOTL1fma8CoFsBeQ5+RW ej2xdv75P/9a42Ky9oO7PuFherQQVuQ3oflV8l/wY6HF9DIxJj9MVxW+LyITw/WqCzgI qbz3A+xY/P1+YJzVFsj6kHYgW5oJT9nryRQPHSoS4uyOqfDSnnGJ8OogPiSLVfipcXSo fPYjs3UQowb3faqnejUsNMgU7/Qrc5kuQpKQD8JVL8LrNpVYVCeQ+89YLq0I2ub748Yt qQ4w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 44-v6si3615715plb.635.2018.04.03.13.22.22; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 13:22:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753163AbeDCUVN convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 3 Apr 2018 16:21:13 -0400 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:59516 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752246AbeDCUVM (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Apr 2018 16:21:12 -0400 Received: by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 8C80A207A4; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 22:21:10 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.bootlin.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT, URIBL_BLOCKED shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from dell-desktop.home (vol75-h03-176-137-37-244.dsl.sta.abo.bbox.fr [176.137.37.244]) by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9BCB820713; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 22:21:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 22:21:08 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TXlsw6huZQ==?= Josserand To: Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: Russell King , Maxime Ripard , Marc Zyngier , Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , devicetree , LABBE Corentin , quentin.schulz@bootlin.com, Thomas Petazzoni , linux-arm-kernel , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/13] ARM: sun8i: smp: Add support for A83T Message-ID: <20180403222108.14ca34d0@dell-desktop.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20180403061836.3926-1-mylene.josserand@bootlin.com> <20180403061836.3926-13-mylene.josserand@bootlin.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Chen-Yu, Thanks for your review. On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 16:47:53 +0800 Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Mylène Josserand > wrote: > > Add the support for A83T. > > > > A83T SoC has an additional register than A80 to handle CPU configurations: > > R_CPUS_CFG. Information about the register comes from Allwinner's BSP > > driver. > > An important difference is the Power Off Gating register for clusters > > which is BIT(4) in case of SUN9I-A80 and BIT(0) in case of SUN8I-A83T. > > There is also a bit swap between sun8i-a83t and sun9i-a80 that must be > > handled. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mylène Josserand > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 117 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c > > index 468a6c46bfc9..72e497dc43ac 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c > > @@ -55,22 +55,31 @@ > > #define CPUCFG_CX_RST_CTRL_L2_RST BIT(8) > > #define CPUCFG_CX_RST_CTRL_CX_RST(n) BIT(4 + (n)) > > #define CPUCFG_CX_RST_CTRL_CORE_RST(n) BIT(n) > > +#define CPUCFG_CX_RST_CTRL_CORE_RST_ALL (0xf << 0) > > > > #define PRCM_CPU_PO_RST_CTRL(c) (0x4 + 0x4 * (c)) > > #define PRCM_CPU_PO_RST_CTRL_CORE(n) BIT(n) > > #define PRCM_CPU_PO_RST_CTRL_CORE_ALL 0xf > > #define PRCM_PWROFF_GATING_REG(c) (0x100 + 0x4 * (c)) > > +/* The power off register for clusters are different from a80 and a83t */ > > +#define PRCM_PWROFF_GATING_REG_CLUSTER_SUN8I BIT(0) > > #define PRCM_PWROFF_GATING_REG_CLUSTER_SUN9I BIT(4) > > #define PRCM_PWROFF_GATING_REG_CORE(n) BIT(n) > > #define PRCM_PWR_SWITCH_REG(c, cpu) (0x140 + 0x10 * (c) + 0x4 * (cpu)) > > #define PRCM_CPU_SOFT_ENTRY_REG 0x164 > > > > +/* R_CPUCFG registers, specific to SUN8I */ > > You should mention it as A83T specific, since sun8i covers the > entire Cortex-A7-based SoC family. Thanks, Maxime already told me that, I tried to pay attention to change every "sun8i" into "sun8i-a83t" but I missed that one. > > > +#define R_CPUCFG_CLUSTER_PO_RST_CTRL(c) (0x30 + (c) * 0x4) > > +#define R_CPUCFG_CLUSTER_PO_RST_CTRL_CORE(n) BIT(n) > > +#define R_CPUCFG_CPU_SOFT_ENTRY_REG 0x01a4 > > + > > #define CPU0_SUPPORT_HOTPLUG_MAGIC0 0xFA50392F > > #define CPU0_SUPPORT_HOTPLUG_MAGIC1 0x790DCA3A > > > > static void __iomem *cpucfg_base; > > static void __iomem *prcm_base; > > static void __iomem *sram_b_smp_base; > > +static void __iomem *r_cpucfg_base; > > static int index; > > > > /* > > @@ -81,6 +90,7 @@ struct sunxi_mc_smp_nodes { > > struct device_node *prcm_node; > > struct device_node *cpucfg_node; > > struct device_node *sram_node; > > + struct device_node *r_cpucfg_node; > > }; > > > > /* This structure holds SoC-specific bits tied to an enable-method string. */ > > @@ -94,6 +104,7 @@ extern void sunxi_mc_smp_secondary_startup(void); > > extern void sunxi_mc_smp_resume(void); > > > > static int __init sun9i_a80_get_smp_nodes(struct sunxi_mc_smp_nodes *nodes); > > +static int __init sun8i_a83t_get_smp_nodes(struct sunxi_mc_smp_nodes *nodes); > > > > static const struct sunxi_mc_smp_data sunxi_mc_smp_data[] __initconst = { > > { > > @@ -101,6 +112,11 @@ static const struct sunxi_mc_smp_data sunxi_mc_smp_data[] __initconst = { > > .get_smp_nodes = sun9i_a80_get_smp_nodes, > > .is_sun9i = true, > > }, > > + { > > + .enable_method = "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-smp", > > + .get_smp_nodes = sun8i_a83t_get_smp_nodes, > > + .is_sun9i = false, > > + }, > > }; > > > > static bool sunxi_core_is_cortex_a15(unsigned int core, unsigned int cluster) > > @@ -188,6 +204,16 @@ static int sunxi_cpu_powerup(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster) > > reg &= ~PRCM_CPU_PO_RST_CTRL_CORE(cpu); > > writel(reg, prcm_base + PRCM_CPU_PO_RST_CTRL(cluster)); > > > > + if (r_cpucfg_base) { > > Please check against is_sun9i, since this is A83T specific. My point > is we should be able to see clearly what parts of the code are shared, > and what parts are SoC specific. Okay, it is fine for me, I will update that and I will use a "is_sun8i" as Maxime mentioned in previous series. > > > + /* assert cpu power-on reset */ > > + reg = readl(r_cpucfg_base + > > + R_CPUCFG_CLUSTER_PO_RST_CTRL(cluster)); > > + reg &= ~(R_CPUCFG_CLUSTER_PO_RST_CTRL_CORE(cpu)); > > + writel(reg, r_cpucfg_base + > > + R_CPUCFG_CLUSTER_PO_RST_CTRL(cluster)); > > + udelay(10); > > + } > > + > > /* Cortex-A7: hold L1 reset disable signal low */ > > if (!sunxi_core_is_cortex_a15(cpu, cluster)) { > > reg = readl(cpucfg_base + CPUCFG_CX_CTRL_REG0(cluster)); > > @@ -211,17 +237,38 @@ static int sunxi_cpu_powerup(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster) > > /* open power switch */ > > sunxi_cpu_power_switch_set(cpu, cluster, true); > > > > + /* Handle A83T bit swap */ > > + if (!sunxi_mc_smp_data[index].is_sun9i) { > > + if (cpu == 0) > > + cpu = 4; > > + } > > + > > /* clear processor power gate */ > > reg = readl(prcm_base + PRCM_PWROFF_GATING_REG(cluster)); > > reg &= ~PRCM_PWROFF_GATING_REG_CORE(cpu); > > writel(reg, prcm_base + PRCM_PWROFF_GATING_REG(cluster)); > > udelay(20); > > > > + /* Handle A83T bit swap */ > > + if (!sunxi_mc_smp_data[index].is_sun9i) { > > + if (cpu == 4) > > + cpu = 0; > > + } > > + > > /* de-assert processor power-on reset */ > > reg = readl(prcm_base + PRCM_CPU_PO_RST_CTRL(cluster)); > > reg |= PRCM_CPU_PO_RST_CTRL_CORE(cpu); > > writel(reg, prcm_base + PRCM_CPU_PO_RST_CTRL(cluster)); > > > > + if (r_cpucfg_base) { > > Same here. ack > > > + reg = readl(r_cpucfg_base + > > + R_CPUCFG_CLUSTER_PO_RST_CTRL(cluster)); > > + reg |= R_CPUCFG_CLUSTER_PO_RST_CTRL_CORE(cpu); > > + writel(reg, r_cpucfg_base + > > + R_CPUCFG_CLUSTER_PO_RST_CTRL(cluster)); > > + udelay(10); > > + } > > + > > /* de-assert all processor resets */ > > reg = readl(cpucfg_base + CPUCFG_CX_RST_CTRL(cluster)); > > reg |= CPUCFG_CX_RST_CTRL_DBG_RST(cpu); > > @@ -243,6 +290,14 @@ static int sunxi_cluster_powerup(unsigned int cluster) > > if (cluster >= SUNXI_NR_CLUSTERS) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > + /* For A83T, assert cluster cores resets */ > > + if (!sunxi_mc_smp_data[index].is_sun9i) { > > Here it is correct. ack > > > + reg = readl(cpucfg_base + CPUCFG_CX_RST_CTRL(cluster)); > > + reg &= ~CPUCFG_CX_RST_CTRL_CORE_RST_ALL; /* Core Reset */ > > + writel(reg, cpucfg_base + CPUCFG_CX_RST_CTRL(cluster)); > > + udelay(10); > > + } > > + > > /* assert ACINACTM */ > > reg = readl(cpucfg_base + CPUCFG_CX_CTRL_REG1(cluster)); > > reg |= CPUCFG_CX_CTRL_REG1_ACINACTM; > > @@ -253,6 +308,16 @@ static int sunxi_cluster_powerup(unsigned int cluster) > > reg &= ~PRCM_CPU_PO_RST_CTRL_CORE_ALL; > > writel(reg, prcm_base + PRCM_CPU_PO_RST_CTRL(cluster)); > > > > + /* assert cluster cores resets */ > > + if (r_cpucfg_base) { > > Same here. ack > > > + reg = readl(r_cpucfg_base + > > + R_CPUCFG_CLUSTER_PO_RST_CTRL(cluster)); > > + reg &= ~CPUCFG_CX_RST_CTRL_CORE_RST_ALL; > > + writel(reg, r_cpucfg_base + > > + R_CPUCFG_CLUSTER_PO_RST_CTRL(cluster)); > > + udelay(10); > > + } > > + > > /* assert cluster resets */ > > reg = readl(cpucfg_base + CPUCFG_CX_RST_CTRL(cluster)); > > reg &= ~CPUCFG_CX_RST_CTRL_DBG_SOC_RST; > > @@ -285,6 +350,8 @@ static int sunxi_cluster_powerup(unsigned int cluster) > > reg = readl(prcm_base + PRCM_PWROFF_GATING_REG(cluster)); > > if (sunxi_mc_smp_data[index].is_sun9i) > > reg &= ~PRCM_PWROFF_GATING_REG_CLUSTER_SUN9I; > > + else > > + reg &= ~PRCM_PWROFF_GATING_REG_CLUSTER_SUN8I; > > writel(reg, prcm_base + PRCM_PWROFF_GATING_REG(cluster)); > > udelay(20); > > > > @@ -483,6 +550,8 @@ static int sunxi_cluster_powerdown(unsigned int cluster) > > reg = readl(prcm_base + PRCM_PWROFF_GATING_REG(cluster)); > > if (sunxi_mc_smp_data[index].is_sun9i) > > reg |= PRCM_PWROFF_GATING_REG_CLUSTER_SUN9I; > > + else > > + reg |= PRCM_PWROFF_GATING_REG_CLUSTER_SUN8I; > > writel(reg, prcm_base + PRCM_PWROFF_GATING_REG(cluster)); > > udelay(20); > > > > @@ -564,8 +633,12 @@ static int sunxi_mc_smp_cpu_kill(unsigned int l_cpu) > > return !ret; > > } > > > > -static bool sunxi_mc_smp_cpu_can_disable(unsigned int __unused) > > +static bool sunxi_mc_smp_cpu_can_disable(unsigned int cpu) > > { > > + /* CPU0 hotplug handled only for sun9i-a80 */ > > + if (!sunxi_mc_smp_data[index].is_sun9i) > > + if (cpu == 0) > > + return false; > > Once the above is fixed, this patch is > > Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai Thanks! > > > Would it be possible for you to implement CPU0 hotplug? You needn't > do so as part of this patch or even this series. I disassembled the > BROM just now, and it is much simpler compared to the A80: > > On boot, if running on cpu0, check magic register at 0x01f01dac > for magic value 0xfa50392f. If found, follow secondary startup > like other cores, otherwise continue normal boot procedure. > As you can see they use a register in CPUS-CFG instead of > secure SRAM this time. Sure, I will do it with pleasure. Thank you for the explanation, I will try that and I will let you know if it is working with this setup. Best regards, Mylène -- Mylène Josserand, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://bootlin.com > > > return true; > > } > > #endif > > @@ -645,6 +718,7 @@ static void __init sunxi_mc_smp_put_nodes(struct sunxi_mc_smp_nodes *nodes) > > of_node_put(nodes->prcm_node); > > of_node_put(nodes->cpucfg_node); > > of_node_put(nodes->sram_node); > > + of_node_put(nodes->r_cpucfg_node); > > memset(nodes, 0, sizeof(*nodes)); > > } > > > > @@ -674,6 +748,32 @@ static int __init sun9i_a80_get_smp_nodes(struct sunxi_mc_smp_nodes *nodes) > > return 0; > > } > > > > +static int __init sun8i_a83t_get_smp_nodes(struct sunxi_mc_smp_nodes *nodes) > > +{ > > + nodes->prcm_node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, > > + "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-r-ccu"); > > + if (!nodes->prcm_node) { > > + pr_err("%s: PRCM not available\n", __func__); > > + return -ENODEV; > > + } > > + > > + nodes->cpucfg_node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, > > + "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-cpucfg"); > > + if (!nodes->cpucfg_node) { > > + pr_err("%s: CPUCFG not available\n", __func__); > > + return -ENODEV; > > + } > > + > > + nodes->r_cpucfg_node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, > > + "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-r-cpucfg"); > > + if (!nodes->r_cpucfg_node) { > > + pr_err("%s: RCPUCFG not available\n", __func__); > > + return -ENODEV; > > + } > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > static int __init sunxi_mc_smp_init(void) > > { > > struct sunxi_mc_smp_nodes nodes = { 0 }; > > @@ -752,6 +852,15 @@ static int __init sunxi_mc_smp_init(void) > > pr_err("%s: failed to map secure SRAM\n", __func__); > > goto err_unmap_release_cpucfg; > > } > > + } else { > > + r_cpucfg_base = of_io_request_and_map(nodes.r_cpucfg_node, > > + 0, "sunxi-mc-smp"); > > + if (IS_ERR(r_cpucfg_base)) { > > + ret = PTR_ERR(r_cpucfg_base); > > + pr_err("%s: failed to map R-CPUCFG registers\n", > > + __func__); > > + goto err_unmap_release_cpucfg; > > + } > > } > > > > /* Configure CCI-400 for boot cluster */ > > @@ -759,7 +868,7 @@ static int __init sunxi_mc_smp_init(void) > > if (ret) { > > pr_err("%s: failed to configure boot cluster: %d\n", > > __func__, ret); > > - goto err_unmap_release_secure_sram; > > + goto err_unmap_release_sram_rcpucfg; > > } > > > > /* We don't need the device nodes anymore */ > > @@ -768,6 +877,8 @@ static int __init sunxi_mc_smp_init(void) > > /* Set the hardware entry point address */ > > if (sunxi_mc_smp_data[index].is_sun9i) > > addr = prcm_base + PRCM_CPU_SOFT_ENTRY_REG; > > + else > > + addr = r_cpucfg_base + R_CPUCFG_CPU_SOFT_ENTRY_REG; > > writel(__pa_symbol(sunxi_mc_smp_secondary_startup), addr); > > > > /* Actually enable multi cluster SMP */ > > @@ -777,10 +888,13 @@ static int __init sunxi_mc_smp_init(void) > > > > return 0; > > > > -err_unmap_release_secure_sram: > > +err_unmap_release_sram_rcpucfg: > > if (sunxi_mc_smp_data[index].is_sun9i) { > > iounmap(sram_b_smp_base); > > of_address_to_resource(nodes.sram_node, 0, &res); > > + } else { > > + iounmap(r_cpucfg_base); > > + of_address_to_resource(nodes.r_cpucfg_node, 0, &res); > > } > > release_mem_region(res.start, resource_size(&res)); > > err_unmap_release_cpucfg: > > -- > > 2.11.0 > >